In Reply to: Actually, I explained that early on posted by Ralph on April 19, 2017 at 12:24:57:
It's not really a question of digital "not doing its job" if that has anything to do with reproducing high quality music.It largely has to do with other factors such as:
1. Nostalgia and nurturing fond memories of yore
2. Leveraging existing equipment investment
3. OCD enjoyment of the playback ceremony of looking at, handling, cleaning, and cueing vinyl
4. Collector status of large physical media with artworkI'm in no hurry to sell or replace my collection of
fortyfifty years and still have two turntables, but then I haven't purchased a new title in years. Especially since all of them would be digitally sourced, why?I was in Chicago a couple of weeks ago and visited a cool record store that actually had some new content including a soundtrack that I already have in 24/44. I just couldn't think of a good reason to buy it.
edit: An analogy would be Harley-Davidson motorcycles. There is not a single performance parameter in which they excel vs modern designs. Except for the low volume Porsche designed V-Rod, all of them use antique 45 degree V-twin motors that are inherently out of balance, have poor cooling and less than stellar reliability as compared with rest of the industry. What made sense in 1906 with the twin producing 7 HP vs 4 HP for the single motor is no longer relevant in any evaluation of performance or ride quality. Racing? They can only compete with themselves on dirt tracks.
And yet, they thrive. Why? Nostalgia. Image. Perceived prestige. Cool guy status. Tim Allen grunt envy . "I want to have my fillings shaken loose with a hardtail!" Overweight dentists wanting to don their steed wearing a do-rag. And lots of accessories including H-D logo panties for the little lady.
I will acknowledge, however, that they do excel at one thing: resale value. :)
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- I guess that's the wording that prompted our replies - E-Stat 04/19/1715:42:35 04/19/17 (27)
- RE: I guess that's the wording that prompted our replies - Ralph 08:02:47 04/20/17 (24)
- The 2016 RIAA statistics tell the continuing trend - E-Stat 08:46:09 04/20/17 (23)
- :) we all heard that 30 years ago - Ralph 15:38:01 04/21/17 (22)
- I think it will continue to be a niche product - E-Stat 19:09:38 04/21/17 (21)
- what meter? What niche? - Ralph 09:33:55 04/22/17 (20)
- RE: what meter? What niche? - E-Stat 13:35:55 04/22/17 (17)
- Nice graphic but it's erroneous - Ralph 14:37:21 04/22/17 (16)
- I don't have any difficulty - E-Stat 15:02:01 04/22/17 (15)
- That's not the same as being accurate - Ralph 15:13:45 04/22/17 (14)
- Perhaps you missed the date scale - E-Stat 15:45:03 04/22/17 (13)
- RE: Perhaps you missed the date scale - Analog Scott 15:37:15 04/23/17 (8)
- If you review the 2016 RIAA stats I previously posted - E-Stat 15:43:35 04/23/17 (7)
- You'll find that your billion dollar speculation is more than double the actual $427M answer. - Analog Scott 18:49:19 04/23/17 (6)
- RE: You'll find that your billion dollar speculation is more than double the actual $427M answer. - RGA 17:37:21 05/16/17 (5)
- RE: You'll find that your billion dollar speculation is more than double the actual $427M answer. - Isaak J. Garvey 17:45:24 05/16/17 (4)
- RE: You'll find that your billion dollar speculation is more than double the actual $427M answer. - RGA 19:24:57 05/16/17 (3)
- RE: You'll find that your billion dollar speculation is more than double the actual $427M answer. - Isaak J. Garvey 19:40:00 05/16/17 (0)
- RE: You'll find that your billion dollar speculation is more than double the actual $427M answer. - Isaak J. Garvey 19:37:43 05/16/17 (1)
- RE: You'll find that your billion dollar speculation is more than double the actual $427M answer. - RGA 19:22:18 05/17/17 (0)
- I must have; and I don't - Ralph 20:19:08 04/22/17 (3)
- RE: I must have; and I don't - J. Phelan 21:06:25 04/22/17 (1)
- silly gripe - Analog Scott 15:38:27 04/23/17 (0)
- Well, I don't plan on - E-Stat 21:00:08 04/22/17 (0)
- RE: what meter? What niche? - J. Phelan 10:04:20 04/22/17 (1)
- Surprisingly enough... - E-Stat 13:38:56 04/22/17 (0)
- RE: I guess that's the wording that prompted our replies - J. Phelan 17:42:54 04/19/17 (1)
- Despite your inability to read - E-Stat 18:31:23 04/19/17 (0)