In Reply to: RE: Although the article itself contains at least one patently absurd statement ... posted by Isaak J. Garvey on April 6, 2017 at 08:45:24:
> Another childish attempt to sabotage a thread.
No, I am just teasing you, Dick. I am find it immensely amusing that you
object to me making fun of you like this when in prior threads you have
written about me that:
"Stereophile, the ultimate MQA cheerleader has lost all credibility . . ."
"Luminaries with far more credibility and brain power than you . . . "
"You have no credibility. Pathetic sir. Pathetic."
"I will take the word of Mr. Koch over the likes of you anyday of the week."
"If you were not a Stereophile hack, you would be banned."
"When you have no defense against shilling, phoney journalism, you resort
to name calling."
"clever and cowardly"
And now "No wonder Meridian fired their PR Agency. Why do they need
one..they have you and your little MQA Brigade."
Laughing at you, not with you, Dick.
John Atkinson
Technical Editor, Stereophile
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Although the article itself contains at least one patently absurd statement ... - John Atkinson 04/6/1708:59:02 04/6/17 (7)
- RE: Although the article itself contains at least one patently absurd statement ... - Isaak J. Garvey 09:05:20 04/6/17 (6)
- "You have not published one single critical report of MQA." - DAP 09:45:13 04/6/17 (5)
- RE: "You have not published one single critical report of MQA." - Isaak J. Garvey 09:55:04 04/6/17 (4)
- RE: "You have not published one single critical report of MQA." - J. Phelan 06:30:48 04/7/17 (1)
- RE: "You have not published one single critical report of MQA." - Isaak J. Garvey 07:22:08 04/7/17 (0)
- Consequences? - DAP 10:21:36 04/6/17 (1)
- RE: Consequences? - Isaak J. Garvey 11:05:02 04/6/17 (0)