In Reply to: Strolling down memory lane with Stereophile... posted by regmac on December 9, 2015 at 14:32:40:
> Thanks for posting those vintage remarks from JGH.
You're welcome. I am just 15 issues away from having every "As We See It"
going back to Vol.1 No.1 posted on our website.
> It would appear readers' complaints and attitudes haven't changed much
> during the intervening 40+ years.
I was fascinated that 52 years ago, readers were commenting that their
older gear sounded better than the modern equivalents. (Art Dudley to the
white courtesy telephone!)
John Atkinson
Technical Editor, Stereophile
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Strolling down memory lane with Stereophile... - John Atkinson 12/9/1515:37:44 12/9/15 (9)
- RE: Strolling down memory lane with Stereophile... - A.Wayne 07:27:18 12/11/15 (5)
- Strolling down memory lane with Stereophile... - Steelhead 12:32:25 12/11/15 (3)
- I heard them... - mkuller 08:12:59 12/14/15 (1)
- RE: I heard them... - A.Wayne 07:08:11 12/24/15 (0)
- RE: Strolling down memory lane with Stereophile... - A.Wayne 13:12:32 12/11/15 (0)
- RE: Strolling down memory lane with Stereophile... - E-Stat 11:04:33 12/11/15 (0)
- 52 years ago - mhardy6647 17:08:25 12/10/15 (0)
- Too bad JGH had already tuned out by the time I wrote "Horses for Courses." - John Marks 20:23:22 12/9/15 (1)
- RE: Too bad JGH had already tuned out by the time I wrote "Horses for Courses." - johns dad 06:06:01 12/11/15 (0)