Home Critic's Corner

Discuss a review. Provide constructive feedback. Talk to the industry.

RE: And...

> that still doesn't clarify my inability to reconcile what you said about
> loudspeaker measurements indicating that poor measurements invariably (or
> almost invariably) leads to poor sound but poor measurements for
> amplifiers doesn't.

With loudspeakers, the criteria for listeners finding the sound to be "good"
are well-established. While it is still possible for a listener to prefer
a loudspeaker that is demonstrably poor, I have found this to be rare.

With amplifiers, the criteria are uncertain. However, where a listener
prefers the sound of an amplifier that in my opinion is poorly engineered,
this is because either:

a) there is a relatively high level of second-harmonic distortion, which,
as long as it is not accompanied by excessive intermodulation distortion,
many listeners will prefer; or

b) the amplifier's output impedance is sufficiently high that the tonal
changes this introduces with a specific loudspeaker compensate for that
speaker's own departures from neutrality.

And as I have repeatedly written in Stereophile, the question is left
begging as to whether the listener likes the sound of a poorly engineered
amplifier because of what it does wrong or despite it. To resolve that
question requires resources beyond the reach of a monthly magazine.

John Atkinson
Technical Editor, Stereophile


This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
  Schiit Audio  


Follow Ups Full Thread
Follow Ups

FAQ

Post a Message!

Forgot Password?
Moniker (Username):
Password (Optional):
  Remember my Moniker & Password  (What's this?)    Eat Me
E-Mail (Optional):
Subject:
Message:   (Posts are subject to Content Rules)
Optional Link URL:
Optional Link Title:
Optional Image URL:
Upload Image:
E-mail Replies:  Automagically notify you when someone responds.