Critic's Corner Discuss a review. Provide constructive feedback. Talk to the industry. |
|
In Reply to: Fascinating! posted by musetap on February 16, 2011 at 18:22:15:
With almost 300 sadomasochistic postings,there is no apparent limit to the personal animosity to be vented and ideological knives to be unsheathed.
stalin finally offed trotsky with an icepick in his head. fortunately, there is no such quick and immediate literal endgame in the ethers of the audio asylum. someone has to put this thread out of its misery.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups Full ThreadTopic - OK, Here's a quiz - Jim Austin 18:42:34 02/14/11 (480)
- RE: OK, Here's a quiz - tmsorosk 12:38:51 02/28/11 (0)
- Thanks Jim (and John) - Telynau 23:11:54 02/22/11 (0)
- RE: Thanks Jim (and John) - anthonyh 08:16:39 03/15/11 (0)
- such an obvious omission ... - TBone 10:43:57 02/22/11 (0)
- Ok, Here's a quiz .... I subscribe to Stereophile: Who is Jim Austin???* - jpbeckaudio 14:17:09 02/21/11 (2)
- He's a guy - Jim Austin 14:19:34 02/21/11 (1)
- RE: He's a guy - esande 16:15:47 02/21/11 (0)
- VOTE: Send to WHINER'S WOAD, or not? I vote SEND, please..please, flush now.. YOUR VOTE COUNTS!! - Elizabeth 20:42:06 02/18/11 (13)
- Jeeeeeez! Who put you in charge? If you deleted only YOUR posts... - musetap 12:10:16 02/19/11 (4)
- You are correct. If only... If only i had collected Fashion Dolls and made clothes for them... I'd be happy - Elizabeth 12:26:47 02/19/11 (3)
- Hey, it's never too late to start. - geoffkait 06:57:03 02/20/11 (0)
- Do they make your audio system sound any better? - musetap 12:44:06 02/19/11 (1)
- Only when she puts them in the freezer. nt - Steve Eddy 19:56:48 02/19/11 (0)
- You're one of the biggest whining windbags in this thread! - gme109 07:21:06 02/19/11 (0)
- Agree. - Dave Pogue 05:40:41 02/19/11 (1)
- RE: Agree. - kurt s 06:29:42 02/19/11 (0)
- Trying to avoid an ass kicking now? nt - kurt s 21:07:24 02/18/11 (0)
- RE: VOTE: Send to WHINER'S WOAD, or not? I vote SEND, please..please, flush now.. YOUR VOTE COUNTS!! - john curl 21:04:09 02/18/11 (3)
- RE: VOTE: Send to WHINER'S WOAD, or not? I vote SEND, please..please, flush now.. YOUR VOTE COUNTS!! - Steve Eddy 20:10:20 02/19/11 (2)
- RE: VOTE: Send to WHINER'S WOAD, or not? I vote SEND, please..please, flush now.. YOUR VOTE COUNTS!! - Charles Hansen 08:32:46 02/20/11 (1)
- RE: VOTE: Send to WHINER'S WOAD, or not? I vote SEND, please..please, flush now.. YOUR VOTE COUNTS!! - Steve Eddy 08:59:37 02/20/11 (0)
- MY quiz: did any single person change thier mind from reading all this crap? - Elizabeth 06:18:32 02/17/11 (41)
- No. - kurt s 02:58:07 02/19/11 (2)
- Thanks - Elizabeth 03:21:08 02/19/11 (1)
- Why the nonsense? - kurt s 04:28:40 02/19/11 (0)
- Yes - kurt s 10:15:48 02/17/11 (31)
- For readers of Kurt's posts after the fact: Kurt has chosen to delete the majority of his post messages - Elizabeth 06:30:05 02/19/11 (2)
- Thank you for finishing this. I want to apologize for my antagonizing words, also. Sorry about that . nt - kurt s 04:39:10 02/20/11 (0)
- It was specifically out of "respect" for you. You hated them all. nt - kurt s 06:33:02 02/19/11 (0)
- Oppie's student David Bohm has some good ones, too. - geoffkait 11:59:13 02/17/11 (0)
- Yup. My Tibetan Buddhist name means:" enlightened as one newly drunk" - Elizabeth 11:06:29 02/17/11 (26)
- If you were ever sober, it might not be gibberish to you. - kurt s 11:16:05 02/17/11 (25)
- So you are actually claiming to have taken up Eastern philosophy as a DIRECT result if this thread? - Elizabeth 11:35:58 02/17/11 (24)
- RE: So you are actually claiming to have taken up Eastern philosophy as a DIRECT result if this thread? - kurt s 08:05:24 02/18/11 (5)
- Hey Liz. Why no stupid response to my actual answer here? nt - kurt s 22:13:30 02/18/11 (4)
- wow. you're correct. Good catch on that. - Elizabeth 22:21:00 02/18/11 (3)
- More drunken humor for yourself? - kurt s 03:15:26 02/19/11 (2)
- The response you deleted was more appropriate - Elizabeth 03:24:06 02/19/11 (1)
- RE: The response you deleted was more appropriate - kurt s 03:30:10 02/19/11 (0)
- I find it incredible that you persist on the trivial matters about this. - kurt s 20:34:44 02/17/11 (16)
- You made a comment and i called you on it. You have NOT answered the questiion, anyway - Elizabeth 23:11:34 02/17/11 (15)
- And Happy Magha Puja to you, too! :-) nt - kurt s 04:37:32 02/18/11 (1)
- Thank you. Very kind of you. nt - Elizabeth 20:49:00 02/18/11 (0)
- I don't care about your childish inquiry. You don't seem to take the hint. - kurt s 01:56:10 02/18/11 (12)
- hint:Kurt has no real argument, just a lot of pontificating to obfuscate not answering the question - Elizabeth 19:51:17 02/18/11 (11)
- I have a real argument. It's you with all the fluff. - kurt s 21:20:30 02/18/11 (10)
- LOL, STILL can't answer the question. you are funny - Elizabeth 21:29:08 02/18/11 (9)
- Drunken humor again. Not funny, just sad for you. - kurt s 03:12:49 02/19/11 (7)
- Yeah, poor Liz, gonna cry in my beer over it all..... - Elizabeth 03:39:37 02/19/11 (6)
- 5 hours of sleep or less? Is that normal for you? - kurt s 04:24:18 02/19/11 (5)
- You are concerned for my well being, how touching. More playing games? - Elizabeth 04:49:48 02/19/11 (4)
- I think you are trying to sucker punch me, or - kurt s 05:22:01 02/19/11 (3)
- RE: I think you are trying to sucker punch me, or - john curl 07:39:36 02/19/11 (0)
- Wow, you suffer from a mental illness. Sorry, i didn't know. i apologize for hassling you. nt - Elizabeth 05:27:27 02/19/11 (1)
- What a complete crock of shit from you again. "I didn't know" - so it's okay! - kurt s 05:36:22 02/19/11 (0)
- Yes I can - kurt s 03:06:00 02/19/11 (0)
- RE: So you are actually claiming to have taken up Eastern philosophy as a DIRECT result if this thread? - kurt s 20:21:18 02/17/11 (0)
- I Have A Lovely Pair Of Coconuts - Peter Gunn 07:41:13 02/17/11 (4)
- If hemp will work why not coconut diaphragms? - keith_d 13:08:54 02/17/11 (0)
- Excellent. - Elizabeth 11:08:50 02/17/11 (0)
- +1 (nt) - Beetlemania 09:54:13 02/17/11 (0)
- that was beautiful man! - gme109 09:47:09 02/17/11 (0)
- There's a term for that - geoffkait 07:22:37 02/17/11 (0)
- Fascinating! - musetap 18:22:15 02/16/11 (7)
- Said designer has a REVIEW of a new product there too Parasound Halo JC3 Coincidence?? - Elizabeth 22:25:43 02/16/11 (5)
- "I really doubt more than two additional copies of the March issue will be sold over this set of threads" - musetap 11:13:34 02/17/11 (0)
- It occurs to me that Mr. Curl has (unwittingly?) produced the sort of fierce fecal storm that... - regmac 07:25:01 02/17/11 (3)
- Congrats! One thing this brouhahahohum was lacking was the mention of ... - musetap 08:46:26 02/17/11 (2)
- Or is he using "regmac" now? (nt) - mkuller 18:51:12 02/17/11 (1)
- Doubt it: lack of corn, too much intelligence, no disparaging cable remarks or sexist comments...N/T - musetap 19:04:17 02/17/11 (0)
- RE: Fascinating! - lord addleford 02/16/1118:38:03 02/16/11 (0)
- you kind of shot yourself in the foot with this post - Analog Scott 13:27:25 02/16/11 (2)
- I guess I understand what you're saying - Jim Austin 13:33:09 02/16/11 (1)
- THIS is the funniest post of the day! - Charles Hansen 08:13:30 02/17/11 (0)
- is this the longest thread - ever? (nt - Eldragon@gmx.com 08:10:03 02/16/11 (3)
- Just feels that way, especially since so much of it is re-hash posted before...N/T - musetap 09:51:56 02/16/11 (0)
- I dunno, but it's being made shorter by mods deleting posts for no apparent reason. nt - Steve Eddy 09:06:28 02/16/11 (1)
- Do you think there might be some sort of conspiracy? - geoffkait 12:28:18 02/16/11 (0)
- Mr Austin, when you finally - Beetlemania 07:08:16 02/16/11 (58)
- You are getting to the crux of the matter.... - bjh 13:39:38 02/16/11 (9)
- Did you read it? - Jim Austin 14:00:12 02/16/11 (8)
- They can't hold two opposing thoughts at one time. the article is only asking us to be wary of some tweaks - Elizabeth 22:44:18 02/16/11 (5)
- You go, girl! - geoffkait 04:42:21 02/17/11 (4)
- THAT is a REALLY good picture of me!!! Gee where ever did you find it? - Elizabeth 06:11:27 02/17/11 (3)
- Where did I find it? I'm glad you asked. - geoffkait 07:08:32 02/17/11 (2)
- ROFLMAO !! - Elizabeth 11:50:59 02/17/11 (1)
- RE: ROFLMAO !! - geoffkait 15:25:57 02/17/11 (0)
- Did you read my post? - bjh 14:25:59 02/16/11 (1)
- Hey, count me in as foolhardy too! :-) - josh358 16:19:01 02/16/11 (0)
- I'll just add one thing to what Steve said - Jim Austin 13:28:36 02/16/11 (1)
- The hazards of listening? - Charles Hansen 22:12:51 02/19/11 (0)
- RE: Mr Austin, when you finally - Steve Eddy 09:01:19 02/16/11 (45)
- RE: Mr Austin, when you finally - Beetlemania 13:53:21 02/16/11 (44)
- "measurable differences"? He doesn't - he just likes the brown color. N/T - carcass93 14:16:03 02/16/11 (0)
- RE: Mr Austin, when you finally - Steve Eddy 14:12:45 02/16/11 (42)
- BULLSHIT! - Charles Hansen 08:24:14 02/17/11 (18)
- You must not have had the patience - Beetlemania 09:51:21 02/17/11 (1)
- RE: You must not have had the patience - Steve Eddy 10:20:53 02/17/11 (0)
- Try again, Charles. I know you're not THAT obtuse... - Steve Eddy 09:33:13 02/17/11 (15)
- OK, Steve - Charles Hansen 12:42:03 02/17/11 (14)
- RE: OK, Steve - Steve Eddy 13:32:12 02/17/11 (13)
- Uhh... - Charles Hansen 17:05:01 02/17/11 (12)
- Ayres reputation - Steyr 05:44:48 02/19/11 (1)
- RE: Ayres reputation - john curl 07:46:38 02/19/11 (0)
- RE: Uhh... - Steve Eddy 17:39:58 02/17/11 (9)
- White cables - geoffkait 04:44:28 02/18/11 (2)
- RE: White cables - Tony Lauck 16:00:47 02/18/11 (1)
- Yeah, I can see that - geoffkait 16:30:01 02/18/11 (0)
- Wait just a minute here... - mkuller 18:55:17 02/17/11 (5)
- RE: Wait just a minute here... - Steve Eddy 19:13:01 02/17/11 (4)
- So far you're ahead on substance, if not style. - regmac 07:38:37 02/18/11 (3)
- RE: So far you're ahead on substance, if not style. - Steve Eddy 08:15:27 02/18/11 (2)
- RE: So far you're ahead on substance, if not style. - john curl 08:36:14 02/18/11 (1)
- RE: So far you're ahead on substance, if not style. - Steve Eddy 09:03:06 02/18/11 (0)
- RE: Mr Austin, when you finally - Beetlemania 14:58:37 02/16/11 (22)
- RE: Mr Austin, when you finally - Steve Eddy 15:28:05 02/16/11 (21)
- That was beautiful, thanks for partially rebutting Austin's inane rant - Beetlemania 20:01:13 02/16/11 (20)
- RE: That was beautiful, thanks for partially rebutting Austin's inane rant - Steve Eddy 20:37:20 02/16/11 (19)
- RE: "Not some nonsensical, quack tweak marketed with a bunch of equally nonsensical gibberish and double talk. - geoffkait 04:21:44 02/17/11 (18)
- i see myself in a whole new light: "a nannygoat with panties" wow.... - Elizabeth 06:26:11 02/17/11 (17)
- RE: i see myself in a whole new light: "a nannygoat with panties" wow.... - john curl 06:50:12 02/17/11 (16)
- Sleep tight.. Don't let the bedbugs bite. I got my fill... And You? - Elizabeth 16:51:08 02/17/11 (15)
- RE: Sleep tight.. Don't let the bedbugs bite. I got my fill... And You? - geoffkait 16:59:48 02/17/11 (14)
- RE: Sleep tight.. Don't let the bedbugs bite. I got my fill... And You? - john curl 20:30:36 02/17/11 (13)
- A warning. i am really very boring. i have a strong preference for the truth, and not much interest in others - Elizabeth 23:22:19 02/17/11 (12)
- RE: A warning. i am really very boring. i have a strong preference for the truth, and not much interest in others - john curl 06:28:04 02/18/11 (11)
- no problem nt - Elizabeth 19:24:48 02/18/11 (0)
- RE: A warning. i am really very boring. i have a strong preference for the truth, and not much interest in others - Steve Eddy 11:25:02 02/18/11 (6)
- RE: A warning. i am really very boring. i have a strong preference for the truth, and not much interest in others - john curl 11:46:17 02/18/11 (5)
- RE: A warning. i am really very boring. i have a strong preference for the truth, and not much interest in others - Steve Eddy 12:19:19 02/18/11 (4)
- RE: A warning. i am really very boring. i have a strong preference for the truth, and not much interest in others - john curl 14:27:24 02/18/11 (3)
- I think you should STOP using subject lines that have NOTHING to do with the content thanks nt - Elizabeth 04:55:58 02/19/11 (1)
- RE: I think you should STOP using subject lines that have NOTHING to do with the content thanks nt - john curl 07:52:16 02/19/11 (0)
- RE: A warning. i am really very boring. i have a strong preference for the truth, and not much interest in others - Steve Eddy 15:06:41 02/18/11 (0)
- RE: A warning. i am really very boring. i have a strong preference for the truth, and not much interest in others - Steve Eddy 09:09:09 02/18/11 (2)
- RE: A warning. i am really very boring. i have a strong preference for the truth, and not much interest in others - john curl 09:57:18 02/18/11 (1)
- RE: A warning. i am really very boring. i have a strong preference for the truth, and not much interest in others - Steve Eddy 10:24:01 02/18/11 (0)
- I'm suprised that Mr. Hansen and Mr. Curl seem to support thye idea that - lancelot 20:21:23 02/15/11 (75)
- RE: I'm suprised that Mr. Hansen and Mr. Curl seem to support thye idea that - thetubeguy1954 12:48:45 02/16/11 (5)
- RE: I'm suprised that Mr. Hansen and Mr. Curl seem to support thye idea that - josh358 16:35:21 02/16/11 (3)
- RE: I'm suprised that Mr. Hansen and Mr. Curl seem to support thye idea that - john curl 18:29:18 02/16/11 (2)
- RE: I'm suprised that Mr. Hansen and Mr. Curl seem to support thye idea that - Tony Lauck 19:47:03 02/17/11 (0)
- RE: I'm suprised that Mr. Hansen and Mr. Curl seem to support thye idea that - josh358 20:39:36 02/16/11 (0)
- RE: I'm suprised that Mr. Hansen and Mr. Curl seem to support thye idea that - john curl 14:38:36 02/16/11 (0)
- Strawman - Charles Hansen 08:48:56 02/16/11 (0)
- I believe their position is different than that... - mkuller 21:21:35 02/15/11 (62)
- RE: I believe their position is different than that... - May Belt 12:50:05 02/16/11 (14)
- The problem being that he didn't say it was complete nonsense - josh358 16:44:10 02/16/11 (13)
- RE: "If someone told you that they'd made a functional airplane out of lead, would you not doubt that too? " - geoffkait 10:36:48 02/18/11 (12)
- The space shuttle doesn't use it wings to fly - josh358 12:01:53 02/18/11 (11)
- RE: The space shuttle doesn't use it wings to fly - geoffkait 12:22:17 02/18/11 (10)
- RE: The space shuttle doesn't use it wings to fly - josh358 12:39:35 02/18/11 (9)
- RE: The space shuttle doesn't use it wings to fly - geoffkait 12:47:54 02/18/11 (8)
- RE: The space shuttle doesn't use it wings to fly - rick_m 14:31:12 02/18/11 (3)
- Excellent try! - geoffkait 14:52:18 02/18/11 (2)
- Holy hydrazine batman! - rick_m 21:49:04 02/18/11 (1)
- Valient effort - geoffkait 04:47:17 02/19/11 (0)
- RE: The space shuttle doesn't use it wings to fly - josh358 13:04:58 02/18/11 (3)
- RE: The space shuttle doesn't use it wings to fly - geoffkait 13:29:57 02/18/11 (2)
- RE: The space shuttle doesn't use it wings to fly - josh358 14:16:07 02/18/11 (1)
- RE: The space shuttle doesn't use it wings to fly - geoffkait 14:22:43 02/18/11 (0)
- RE: I believe their position is different than that... - john curl 10:02:15 02/16/11 (6)
- Great. no questions. Agree it is tough to get a CD to sound decent. - Elizabeth 06:29:22 02/17/11 (5)
- That's where tweaks come in. Funny you haven't figured that out yet. nt - geoffkait 11:03:35 02/17/11 (4)
- I prefer DACs - Steyr 05:53:36 02/19/11 (3)
- RE: "I prefer DACs to Tweaks" - geoffkait 08:30:02 02/19/11 (2)
- RE: "I prefer DACs to Tweaks" - Steyr 10:00:19 02/19/11 (1)
- RE: "I prefer DACs to Tweaks" - geoffkait 11:35:13 02/19/11 (0)
- Rejecting out of hand . . . - Pat D 08:16:58 02/16/11 (37)
- I agree with you in essence if not in degree - kerr 12:49:42 02/16/11 (0)
- You've illustrated Mike's point - E-Stat 12:16:28 02/16/11 (30)
- How? I have rejected nothing out of hand. - Pat D 13:01:11 02/16/11 (29)
- RE: " The only real test (of the chip) that I know of was done by Randi." Emphasis on "that I know of" - geoffkait 14:10:43 02/16/11 (16)
- Well? (nt) - Pat D 17:09:52 02/16/11 (15)
- That's a deep subject - geoffkait 19:00:42 02/16/11 (14)
- That's an old one. - Pat D 20:58:17 02/16/11 (13)
- RE: Well, you can whine about Randi's test all you want. You haven't come up with a better one." - geoffkait 03:45:39 02/17/11 (12)
- For $16 I could get two CDs, and they would make an audible difference! - Pat D 05:00:14 02/17/11 (11)
- You're shooting blanks in the dark. nt - geoffkait 05:56:34 02/17/11 (10)
- It's just a matter of priorities. - Pat D 19:05:56 02/17/11 (9)
- Right. And ours are very different. - geoffkait 02:28:59 02/18/11 (8)
- RE: Right. And ours are very different. - Pat D 04:55:24 02/18/11 (7)
- RE: "If I chose to study some audio tweak or a strange audio product, the Intelligent Chip wouldn't be it." - geoffkait 05:29:30 02/18/11 (6)
- RE: "If I chose to study some audio tweak or a strange audio product, the Intelligent Chip wouldn't be it." - Pat D 14:09:26 02/18/11 (5)
- RE: "If I chose to study some audio tweak or a strange audio product, the Intelligent Chip wouldn't be it." - geoffkait 16:48:55 02/18/11 (4)
- RE: "If I chose to study some audio tweak or a strange audio product, the Intelligent Chip wouldn't be it." - Pat D 22:00:38 02/18/11 (3)
- RE: "We do it by listening to CDs and enjoying the music." I used to be like you once upon a time. - geoffkait 02:35:09 02/19/11 (2)
- Genies out of bottles. - Pat D 11:18:20 02/19/11 (1)
- RE: Genies out of bottles. - geoffkait 04:43:24 02/20/11 (0)
- RE: Genies out of bottles. - Pat D 07:04:44 02/28/11 (0)
- RE: Genies out of bottles. - geoffkait 08:04:11 02/28/11 (0)
- Classic response! - E-Stat 13:10:11 02/16/11 (11)
- Still illogical. - Pat D 13:20:11 02/16/11 (10)
- Let me ask you this - is there anything at all ... - carcass93 14:09:48 02/16/11 (6)
- Let's see, instead of talking about audio . . . - Pat D 17:13:17 02/16/11 (0)
- The scene: Pat D and wife at grocery - E-Stat 16:35:13 02/16/11 (4)
- Beautiful. N/T - carcass93 09:02:26 02/17/11 (0)
- No wonder your mind isn't working right . . . - Pat D 17:25:10 02/16/11 (2)
- You really don't know what - E-Stat 17:36:20 02/16/11 (1)
- Ding...ding...ding... - mkuller 19:16:14 02/16/11 (0)
- That's exactly what I thought of your response! - E-Stat 13:46:50 02/16/11 (2)
- RE: That's exactly what I thought of your response! - Pat D 17:08:58 02/16/11 (1)
- "As a consumer, I just don't see any reason to buy an unproven product. " - E-Stat 17:33:08 02/16/11 (0)
- As a consumer, not in the least concerned with improving quality of music reproduction,... - carcass93 08:47:05 02/16/11 (4)
- Ahh, carcass93 pretending to further the science and craft of audio. - Pat D 13:12:29 02/16/11 (3)
- What's eating away at you? - carcass93 14:03:34 02/16/11 (2)
- I was afraid I'd touch a nerve . . . - Pat D 17:29:57 02/16/11 (1)
- Patty... next time you're afraid to touch a nerve,... - carcass93 08:58:49 02/17/11 (0)
- RE: I believe their position is different than that... - Todd Krieger 23:35:00 02/15/11 (1)
- You are advocating caution and want science to assure you. - Norm 07:29:10 02/16/11 (0)
- Just the opposite. I think John Curl is annoyed he is lumped in with the tweakers by Jim Austin - Elizabeth 21:18:06 02/15/11 (4)
- RE: Just the opposite. I think John Curl is annoyed he is lumped in with the tweakers by Jim Austin - john curl 03:49:41 02/16/11 (3)
- Cool. Creative people usually have wide and far ranging interests - Elizabeth 04:42:23 02/16/11 (2)
- RE: Cool. Creative people usually have wide and far ranging interests - john curl 09:28:48 02/16/11 (1)
- top gear - Steyr 09:38:03 02/16/11 (0)
- RE: OK, Here's a quiz - JNS 15:46:33 02/15/11 (101)
- "For the first time I wish I had an issue of Stereophile in my hand." Might be the point of all this nonsense. - gme109 18:04:00 02/15/11 (0)
- Got anger? nt - Beetlemania 16:46:49 02/15/11 (99)
- RE: Got anger? nt - JNS 18:07:00 02/15/11 (88)
- I'll tell you what I find childish. Those who feel a need to comment on products they've never even heard - gme109 18:13:29 02/15/11 (87)
- RE: I'll tell you what I find childish. Those who feel a need to comment on products they've never even heard - JNS 05:25:11 02/16/11 (1)
- RE: I'll tell you what I find childish. Those who feel a need to comment on products they've never even heard - gme109 05:36:35 02/16/11 (0)
- That is the same nonsense over and over. NO ONE would have to try it it is pure hokum 100% BS - Elizabeth 18:23:00 02/15/11 (84)
- You missed my point - gme109 18:32:19 02/15/11 (83)
- The same thing I don't understand. - carcass93 19:53:24 02/15/11 (41)
- yup. it is BS. Does anyone question wherther the tweak in question (intellichip) is bogus? - Elizabeth 22:11:00 02/15/11 (40)
- RE: "Does anyone question whether the intellichip) is bogus?" - not those who've heard it - geoffkait 04:07:06 02/16/11 (39)
- RE: "Does anyone question whether the intellichip) is bogus?" - not those who've heard it - gofish 14:24:10 02/16/11 (13)
- RE: "you are selling them something that puts put enough energy that the photons can penetrate metal." - geoffkait 14:36:52 02/16/11 (12)
- RE: "you are selling them something that puts put enough energy that the photons can penetrate metal." - gofish 15:05:04 02/16/11 (11)
- RE: "Photons can penetrate metal" - geoffkait 15:27:18 02/16/11 (10)
- RE: "Photons can penetrate metal" - gofish 04:52:09 02/17/11 (9)
- RE: "While I can't help what you believe I did try to educate you in the earlier post." - geoffkait 05:47:31 02/17/11 (8)
- furthermore... - BS64 02:05:55 02/18/11 (5)
- RE: furthermore... - geoffkait 03:52:56 02/18/11 (4)
- answering a question with a question - BS64 13:38:55 02/18/11 (3)
- Questions, you have questions - geoffkait 13:52:33 02/18/11 (2)
- answers - BS64 21:30:44 02/18/11 (1)
- RE: "Is ANY of it really an "answer?" Have you tried Wikipedia? nt - geoffkait 02:47:45 02/19/11 (0)
- RE: "While I can't help what you believe I did try to educate you in the earlier post." - gofish 08:54:28 02/17/11 (1)
- RE: "Now you will have to let me know how they interact if neither can penetrate the shell of the player." - geoffkait 11:33:10 02/17/11 (0)
- RE: "Does anyone question whether the intellichip) is bogus?" - not those who've heard it - regmac 07:53:25 02/16/11 (5)
- RE: "Does anyone question whether the intellichip) is bogus?" - not those who've heard it - geoffkait 08:48:35 02/16/11 (4)
- You neglected to address sales growth for the chip. I understand sales have been anemic. Odd that. - regmac 10:16:06 02/16/11 (3)
- RE: You neglected to address sales growth for the chip. I understand sales have been anemic. Odd that. - geoffkait 10:25:29 02/16/11 (2)
- RE: You neglected to address sales growth for the chip. I understand sales have been anemic. Odd that. - regmac 10:28:30 02/16/11 (1)
- RE: "I rest my case" - You don't have a case. Well, except for a case of the ass. nt - geoffkait 10:37:40 02/16/11 (0)
- "highly prized as a conversation starter" LOL! Thanks! nt - Beetlemania 07:10:43 02/16/11 (0)
- RE: "Does anyone question whether the intellichip) is bogus?" - not those who've heard it - JNS 05:28:47 02/16/11 (17)
- RE: "Does anyone question whether the intellichip) is bogus?" - not those who've heard it - geoffkait 05:43:20 02/16/11 (15)
- And then,with this sort of reasoning, you WONDER why some folks just flat out laugh? - Elizabeth 05:54:07 02/16/11 (13)
- RE: And then,with this sort of reasoning, you WONDER why some folks just flat out laugh? - geoffkait 05:57:51 02/16/11 (12)
- Dense! - Steyr 08:23:52 02/16/11 (11)
- Another pseudo-skeptic that won't listen to reason. - geoffkait 08:50:29 02/16/11 (10)
- skeptic - Steyr 09:08:41 02/16/11 (9)
- RE: skeptic - geoffkait 09:33:53 02/16/11 (8)
- Yes regularly - Steyr 09:42:33 02/16/11 (7)
- You just can't seem to catch a break, can you? - geoffkait 09:53:38 02/16/11 (6)
- outlier - Steyr 10:04:27 02/16/11 (5)
- RE: "And it's no longer in production? Correct?" - geoffkait 10:45:12 02/16/11 (4)
- Try this - Steyr 11:26:18 02/16/11 (3)
- Huh? What's that got to do with the price of spinach? - geoffkait 11:40:00 02/16/11 (2)
- Here's The Right Link (nt) - thetubeguy1954 17:52:40 02/16/11 (1)
- Thanks! - geoffkait 19:08:59 02/16/11 (0)
- Sounds farfetched to me - kerr 05:52:40 02/16/11 (0)
- No one expects 'magic fairy dust' to last very long! Don't you KNOW that too? - Elizabeth 05:41:29 02/16/11 (0)
- If there's a steaming pile of shit standing on your doorstep - Jim Austin 18:47:10 02/15/11 (40)
- If a "reviewer" writes entirely by speculation - E-Stat 06:00:37 02/16/11 (0)
- Are you talking about your own article in Stereophile? - carcass93 20:00:02 02/15/11 (0)
- I see your reading comprehension is also lacking - gme109 19:43:15 02/15/11 (32)
- Doesn't matter. - Dave Pogue 05:35:10 02/16/11 (31)
- There are perfectly good reasons why some folks could not hear the chip. nt - geoffkait 05:51:25 02/16/11 (27)
- LOL, #1: they are not gulllible, #2: they are not easily hypnotised #3: their mind tends NOt to play tricks nt - Elizabeth 06:00:58 02/16/11 (26)
- Actually, you're very very close - geoffkait 06:05:33 02/16/11 (25)
- Yeah, the he(a)rd mentality - Dave Pogue 06:12:39 02/16/11 (24)
- Negative Expectation Bais - geoffkait 06:32:50 02/16/11 (23)
- Same Thing For Nocebo Effect Geff! - thetubeguy1954 17:42:59 02/16/11 (6)
- Self-fulfilling prophesy - The Placebo Effect's Evil Twin - geoffkait 19:35:51 02/16/11 (0)
- Did that actually happen? - josh358 18:26:16 02/16/11 (4)
- RE: Did that actually happen? - thetubeguy1954 14:12:47 02/21/11 (1)
- RE: Did that actually happen? - josh358 08:07:45 02/22/11 (0)
- Haven't you watched enough horrer movies to accept it does? - Elizabeth 22:57:47 02/16/11 (1)
- Heh, thanks (nt) - josh358 09:25:05 02/18/11 (0)
- RE: Negative Expectation Bais - Dave Pogue 08:40:43 02/16/11 (15)
- RE: Negative Expectation Bias - geoffkait 09:02:41 02/16/11 (14)
- Now Geoff, Really. The Chip was a "party favor?") - Dave Pogue 09:50:25 02/16/11 (13)
- You have been terminated - geoffkait 09:58:25 02/16/11 (12)
- Hoist with his own party favors, er, petard :-) - Dave Pogue 10:07:34 02/16/11 (11)
- Just remember, old-timer - geoffkait 12:14:27 02/16/11 (10)
- So you're saying the Chip has zero effect under 10kHz. - Dave Pogue 12:56:33 02/16/11 (9)
- RE: So you're saying the Chip has zero effect under 10kHz. - geoffkait 13:08:17 02/16/11 (8)
- RE: So you're saying the Chip has zero effect under 10kHz. - Dave Pogue 13:16:22 02/16/11 (7)
- RE: So you're saying the Chip has zero effect under 10kHz. - geoffkait 13:37:20 02/16/11 (6)
- A thought for the day. - Dave Pogue 13:54:53 02/16/11 (5)
- RE: A thought for the day. - Steve Eddy 14:26:18 02/16/11 (3)
- RE: A thought for the day. - geoffkait 15:11:49 02/16/11 (0)
- I once thought Kait had some credibility. - Dave Pogue 14:30:08 02/16/11 (1)
- Thanks, coming from you I take that as a compliment. - geoffkait 14:43:42 02/16/11 (0)
- Here's another thought for the day. - geoffkait 14:25:12 02/16/11 (0)
- RE: Doesn't matter. - gme109 05:41:32 02/16/11 (2)
- RE: Doesn't matter. - Dave Pogue 06:19:34 02/16/11 (1)
- again, you missed the point - gme109 13:07:48 02/16/11 (0)
- agree. nt - Elizabeth 18:51:49 02/15/11 (4)
- Your history about making comments and drawing conclusions, about products you haven't heard, is well known - gme109 19:54:38 02/15/11 (3)
- Fair enough. problem is you left off your conclusion. Which is? - Elizabeth 20:04:58 02/15/11 (2)
- Conclusion: In audio, if you haven't heard a product, your opinion is meaningless - gme109 21:26:58 02/15/11 (1)
- straight forward enough. Lucky i can ignore your request with impunity - Elizabeth 22:14:01 02/15/11 (0)
- RE: Got anger? nt - john curl 17:16:50 02/15/11 (9)
- RE: Got anger? nt - JNS 17:53:07 02/15/11 (8)
- RE: Got anger? nt - john curl 17:57:57 02/15/11 (7)
- "...especially after years of no contact." Yeah, he don't call, he don't write. Hey, hell hath no fury... - Enophile 19:01:11 02/15/11 (0)
- You ARE nuts. Sorry, but that statement is pure paranoid delusion - Elizabeth 18:29:38 02/15/11 (5)
- You are speaking about "pure paranoid delusion"? That's rich. - carcass93 19:39:49 02/15/11 (1)
- Slander is what one uses to hit back if they actually have nothing of any value to strike back with nt - Elizabeth 20:07:11 02/15/11 (0)
- RE: You ARE nuts. Sorry, but that statement is pure paranoid delusion - john curl 18:39:30 02/15/11 (2)
- Well, when "this" action resides... - musetap 22:16:03 02/15/11 (0)
- I do not think you are silly, but the comment on wanting some action makes sense nt - Elizabeth 20:41:31 02/15/11 (0)
- RE: OK, Here's a quiz - das@soundstage.com 12:46:43 02/15/11 (17)
- RE: OK, Here's a quiz - acres verde 15:57:36 02/15/11 (13)
- Your message is pretty perceptive - Jim Austin 18:02:45 02/15/11 (4)
- Trust your ears, trust your common sense too! nt - Elizabeth 19:20:11 02/15/11 (3)
- Why is it called common sense when so few people have it? nt - geoffkait 04:32:16 02/16/11 (2)
- Lord knows you count on that (nt) - Dave Pogue 05:47:30 02/17/11 (1)
- Well, at least I know I can always count on you. nt - geoffkait 05:52:17 02/17/11 (0)
- I'm Not Doug Schroeder - das@soundstage.com 16:54:11 02/15/11 (7)
- RE: I'm Not Doug Schroeder - acres verde 10:07:02 02/16/11 (6)
- RE: I'm Not Doug Schroeder - geoffkait 10:47:48 02/16/11 (5)
- RE: I'm Not Doug Schroeder - acres verde 12:08:40 02/16/11 (4)
- RE: I'm Not Doug Schroeder - geoffkait 12:20:03 02/16/11 (3)
- RE: I'm Not Doug Schroeder - das@soundstage.com 20:39:43 02/16/11 (2)
- RE: I'm Not Doug Schroeder - acres verde 09:16:12 02/17/11 (1)
- RE: I'm Not Doug Schroeder - das@soundstage.com 13:15:29 02/17/11 (0)
- RE: OK, Here's a quiz - Jim Austin 14:15:49 02/15/11 (2)
- RE: OK, Here's a quiz - das@soundstage.com 17:12:29 02/15/11 (1)
- Preaching to the choir - Jim Austin 18:05:26 02/15/11 (0)
- RE: OK, Here's a quiz - Pat D 12:39:52 02/15/11 (0)
- Refresher course. - carcass93 11:51:49 02/15/11 (5)
- Whole lot of poster's in that thread that post no more hearabouts...N/T - musetap 15:23:34 02/15/11 (0)
- Just posting that thread link improved the sound of my system. Thanks! - Enophile 12:25:31 02/15/11 (0)
- jeeeeezzzzz..... nt - Elizabeth 12:23:01 02/15/11 (0)
- Geoff Kait himself wins Post of the Year in that thread - kerr 11:58:37 02/15/11 (0)
- Thanks...that's a classic...(nt) - mkuller 11:58:33 02/15/11 (0)
- RE: OK, Here's a quiz - rick_m 11:03:06 02/15/11 (6)
- It's OK - Jim Austin 14:06:33 02/15/11 (3)
- RE: It's OK - Tony Lauck 18:43:32 02/17/11 (1)
- RE: "I don't spend money on tweaks, either." - geoffkait 04:32:38 02/18/11 (0)
- Uhh.. I think Pauli got it right. - Charles Hansen 19:36:13 02/15/11 (0)
- I agree with much of your post - Beetlemania 11:31:38 02/15/11 (1)
- RE: I agree with much of your post - john curl 12:00:46 02/15/11 (0)
- Your only problem is that you think you are a scientist and are really close-minded, a very unscientific act.* - Norm 11:02:13 02/15/11 (34)
- What do you use for medicine, Norm? - Jim Austin 14:45:47 02/15/11 (12)
- That's pretty pathetic - I'm sure Norm could have a field day with this. - carcass93 14:58:32 02/15/11 (11)
- Actually - Jim Austin 15:02:13 02/15/11 (10)
- Wrong Jim, "skeptical of bullshit" They are skeptical only. - Norm 06:51:21 02/16/11 (0)
- Exactly - REAL scientists are open-minded. - carcass93 15:13:23 02/15/11 (8)
- IF the item was something they are interested in maybe, but if asked: is this crap? they can say 'it's crap'. - Elizabeth 18:48:25 02/15/11 (5)
- You can say you think something is bullshit, but not with any authority. Nor can you say you are/were right - Norm 06:57:17 02/16/11 (4)
- "no one?" You did.. - Sordidman 10:42:35 02/16/11 (3)
- Err, can you tell me where? - Norm 11:07:42 02/16/11 (2)
- You purchased the chip and used it , you write from experience -t - Sordidman 10:31:47 02/18/11 (1)
- Err, yes I said I heard some benefit. I hardly claimed any authority. One man's experiences. nt - Norm 07:06:56 02/20/11 (0)
- I do not claim to be a "real scientist" - Jim Austin 15:19:38 02/15/11 (1)
- Is dark energy bullshit? nt - Norm 09:38:48 02/16/11 (0)
- No, it is very "scientific" to close one's mind. Scientists know everything. - samtellig 14:31:12 02/15/11 (18)
- Yep, the first rule of science! :() nt - Norm 07:06:34 02/16/11 (0)
- Well Sam, if we Scientists knew everything... - morricab 05:15:23 02/16/11 (0)
- Sam, Sam, Sam! - Charles Hansen 20:10:00 02/15/11 (7)
- he said he wants to put more distance between skilled audio design and jar of rocks - Elizabeth 20:56:34 02/15/11 (6)
- RE: he said he wants to put more distance between skilled audio design and jar of rocks - Charles Hansen 09:00:41 02/16/11 (4)
- You have it completely wrong. - Jim Austin 15:04:55 02/17/11 (1)
- RE: You have it completely wrong. - Charles Hansen 17:11:08 02/17/11 (0)
- Don't forget C) There is no difference. - Enophile 12:29:30 02/16/11 (1)
- RE: Don't forget C) There is no difference. - Charles Hansen 17:09:03 02/17/11 (0)
- Sorry, the Genie is already out of the bag... - geoffkait 04:17:27 02/16/11 (0)
- So, what does your *open mind* say about the pebbles and the chip Sam--NT - lancelot 18:58:01 02/15/11 (2)
- As I understand, pebbles are just crystals (RFI blockers) - read Tweaker's. - carcass93 19:37:19 02/15/11 (1)
- He obviously didn't get the memo. Crystals have gone mainstream. nt - geoffkait 04:10:40 02/16/11 (0)
- RE: No, it is very "scientific" to close one's mind. Scientists know everything. - john curl 17:23:46 02/15/11 (1)
- RE: No, it is very "scientific" to close one's mind. Scientists know everything. - Tony Lauck 18:29:49 02/17/11 (0)
- Careful Sam, if we writers start to bicker, JA's gonna be pissed! (nt) - Jim Austin 14:36:15 02/15/11 (2)
- Silence those who disagree. That's what I expect from scientists. Thanks for the warning. I'll shut up.(nt) - samtellig 14:58:47 02/15/11 (1)
- Don't shut up on my account. - Jim Austin 15:05:05 02/15/11 (0)
- "think you are a scientist" - HE DOES??? - carcass93 11:11:48 02/15/11 (1)
- You would think I would learn! - kerr 12:02:20 02/15/11 (0)
- Some serious egomania here, and top job peddling your column!...N/T - musetap 10:49:16 02/15/11 (1)
- The blog is inactive - Jim Austin 10:51:41 02/15/11 (0)
- after another re-read I find - Steyr 09:44:34 02/15/11 (4)
- Not here in Maine. Here it will be winter for another 47 months. - Jim Austin 09:48:50 02/15/11 (3)
- In WI - Steyr 09:53:01 02/15/11 (2)
- Not to worry - Jim Austin 09:55:48 02/15/11 (1)
- Caveat emptor - Steyr 10:19:11 02/15/11 (0)
- RE: OK, Here's a quiz - volunteer 08:27:38 02/15/11 (1)
- We all seem to agree on that. The 'history' is in some of the posts (or links) below nt - Elizabeth 08:36:23 02/15/11 (0)
- Your tardy reply cost me $20. - regmac 08:15:15 02/15/11 (0)
- This thread is an obvious specific and personal insult to John Curl. As was the original column. - Enophile 08:10:43 02/15/11 (1)
- Obviously there's a history between Curl & Austin - mls-stl 09:24:49 02/15/11 (0)
- OK, Here's a clue - morgan1 08:08:53 02/15/11 (4)
- Gee, were you looking in a mirror when you wrote the above dreck? - Elizabeth 08:32:53 02/15/11 (3)
- Ditto* - morgan1 09:00:46 02/15/11 (2)
- Good, you agree with her. - Dave Pogue 11:34:51 02/15/11 (1)
- Can't say the same for... - morgan1 13:55:12 02/15/11 (0)
- What is an AWSI? Do you think any of us are sane? Do you think you are? - Frihed89 06:19:54 02/15/11 (2)
- AWSI: Stereophile column: As We See It. this is about the March 2011 As We See It column - Elizabeth 06:22:18 02/15/11 (1)
- AWSI=As We See It (nt) - jeffmathers 07:17:13 02/15/11 (0)
- Audiophile outsider conducts witch hunt...again. Am I close? - geoffkait 04:32:01 02/15/11 (8)
- No, not close - Jim Austin 05:26:09 02/15/11 (7)
- WTF do I know? I don't have a Ph.D. in physics. But isn't this a little condescending? - samtellig 05:53:25 02/15/11 (6)
- C'mon 'Sam', it's Geoff Kait! - Jim Austin 06:15:12 02/15/11 (4)
- RE: C'mon 'Sam', it's Geoff Kait! no kidding. Geoff is like GROUND ZERO, LOL! - Elizabeth 06:20:02 02/15/11 (3)
- Right on que, Lizzie , All I have to do is mention witch. --( - geoffkait 08:24:06 02/15/11 (2)
- witch. ROFLMAO !!! - Elizabeth 08:41:06 02/15/11 (1)
- RE: witch. ROFLMAO !!! - geoffkait 09:12:52 02/15/11 (0)
- RE: WTF do I know? I don't have a Ph.D. in physics. But isn't this a little condescending? - bjh 06:01:37 02/15/11 (0)
- My question to those who read it would be ... - bjh 03:38:58 02/15/11 (1)
- FAIL (NT) - Jim Austin 04:19:56 02/15/11 (0)
- what you said - Elizabeth 23:35:10 02/14/11 (23)
- Elizabeth, if you read Austin's related ASWI - Beetlemania 07:41:08 02/15/11 (22)
- Now that i understand all the history, I see it is a washing of dirty laundry all around - Elizabeth 07:52:29 02/15/11 (21)
- "Too bad all this is being aired." Au contraire! Victory all around, it's about the publicity and controversy! - Enophile 09:39:02 02/15/11 (0)
- RE: Now that i understand all the history, I see it is a washing of dirty laundry all around - Beetlemania 08:17:26 02/15/11 (7)
- Here's my master plan - Jim Austin 09:48:03 02/15/11 (1)
- LOL first part, second part agree completely: More... - Elizabeth 11:28:24 02/15/11 (0)
- He didnot say it was'wrong' just that we should be more careful about accepting such claims - Elizabeth 08:50:20 02/15/11 (0)
- "Why should Jim Austin get to decide.." - volunteer 08:35:23 02/15/11 (3)
- To paraphrase from the current AWSI - Beetlemania 13:36:07 02/15/11 (2)
- RE: To paraphrase from the current AWSI - volunteer 14:06:09 02/15/11 (1)
- Perhaps incomplete synthesis but - Beetlemania 16:45:59 02/15/11 (0)
- RE: Now that i understand all the history, I see it is a washing of dirty laundry all around - john curl 08:13:30 02/15/11 (11)
- RE: Now that i understand all the history, I see it is a washing of dirty laundry all around - TomLarson 09:45:16 02/15/11 (9)
- Therein, I think, lies the crux of the disagreement - Beetlemania 10:05:37 02/15/11 (8)
- RE: Therein, I think, lies the crux of the disagreement - TomLarson 11:42:59 02/15/11 (2)
- RE: Therein, I think, lies the crux of the disagreement - john curl 12:06:48 02/15/11 (1)
- RE: Therein, I think, lies the crux of the disagreement - TomLarson 12:33:15 02/15/11 (0)
- RE: "I have no idea of how Mr Curl came to listen to the IC or what he thought of manufacturer's explanation." - geoffkait 10:42:16 02/15/11 (4)
- RE: "I have no idea of how Mr Curl came to listen to the IC or what he thought of manufacturer's explanation." - john curl 10:52:24 02/15/11 (3)
- Can we burn Geoff in effigy? please please... - Elizabeth 11:34:06 02/15/11 (2)
- RE: Can we burn Geoff in effigy? please please... - volunteer 15:58:35 02/15/11 (0)
- RE: Can we burn Geoff in effigy? If you do, it will enhance the sound of your Hi Fi, as well! Win win! - Enophile 15:36:29 02/15/11 (0)
- Thanks for the comment. nt - Elizabeth 08:58:32 02/15/11 (0)
- "How many of you understood it?" Why ask? - hesson11 21:44:49 02/14/11 (5)
- Well I certainly... - Jim Austin 04:23:13 02/15/11 (4)
- Thanks, Jim - hesson11 05:00:59 02/15/11 (3)
- Here's what you missed - Jim Austin 05:28:51 02/15/11 (2)
- Well, that certainly helps! - hesson11 08:09:11 02/15/11 (0)
- So it does go way back.. interesting.. very interesting. and hey I won didn't I? nt - Elizabeth 06:17:28 02/15/11 (0)
- I have flunked your AWSI quiz - Beetlemania 21:15:32 02/14/11 (35)
- RE: I have flunked your AWSI quiz - John Atkinson 10:53:30 02/15/11 (0)
- Question - mls-stl 08:43:18 02/15/11 (33)
- Gee whiz, mea culpa for explicitly writing it - Beetlemania 09:52:13 02/15/11 (14)
- The masses want opinions. Questions are asked all the time to offer opinions on stuff, so they get answers - Elizabeth 19:18:18 02/15/11 (5)
- RE: "majority of the current evidence is the chip does not work. If it did, they would still be selling, hey." - geoffkait 05:22:23 02/18/11 (0)
- The flip side of "I told you so" cards - Tony Lauck 18:20:00 02/17/11 (3)
- Looking for heroes? - soulfood 07:25:47 02/18/11 (2)
- RE: Looking for heroes? - Tony Lauck 07:42:01 02/18/11 (1)
- RE: "Perhaps I misunderstood the claim." - geoffkait 07:58:53 02/18/11 (0)
- Well, that's just dandy ... - Dave Pogue 13:28:38 02/15/11 (5)
- RE: Well, that's just dandy ... - geoffkait 14:24:40 02/15/11 (2)
- RE: Well, that's just dandy ... - Dave Pogue 14:40:56 02/15/11 (1)
- RE: Well, that's just dandy ... - geoffkait 14:51:47 02/15/11 (0)
- I'm going to assume your question is serious - Beetlemania 13:48:30 02/15/11 (1)
- It was semi-serious. - Dave Pogue 14:23:41 02/15/11 (0)
- This thread should have been titled... - mls-stl 11:02:29 02/15/11 (0)
- Pretty obvious, isn't it? N/T - carcass93 09:59:35 02/15/11 (0)
- The answer seems obvious, no? - carcass93 09:00:19 02/15/11 (17)
- RE: The answer seems obvious, no? - mls-stl 09:20:19 02/15/11 (16)
- RE: The answer seems obvious, no? - kurt s 06:39:10 02/16/11 (0)
- I'm sure you could do without pretending to not understand the scope of discussion. - carcass93 09:48:58 02/15/11 (1)
- It appears... - mls-stl 10:38:16 02/15/11 (0)
- RE: The answer seems obvious, no? - regmac 09:32:31 02/15/11 (12)
- Let's get away from your conjectures,... - carcass93 09:56:36 02/15/11 (11)
- RE: Let's get away from your conjectures,... - mls-stl 10:55:48 02/15/11 (4)
- RE: "you can blame that on my bad hearing, lack of training or mediocre system or just innate neanderthalism" - geoffkait 14:44:01 02/15/11 (0)
- RE: Let's get away from your conjectures,... - john curl 13:59:14 02/15/11 (2)
- Absolutely - fuse holder contacts have to be cleaned before trying. - carcass93 14:43:44 02/15/11 (0)
- What about audio cables - Steyr 14:25:50 02/15/11 (0)
- Let's get away from dogma. - regmac 10:39:01 02/15/11 (5)
- Not to otherwise disagree with your post - Beetlemania 11:10:00 02/15/11 (0)
- To most of us, raising the quality of sound reproduction is the ultimate goal. - carcass93 10:44:01 02/15/11 (3)
- That'll have to be the last word, my friend. Lunch and a walk. - regmac 10:55:06 02/15/11 (2)
- Would be nice If you'd learn how to use "NT" properly. - carcass93 11:02:18 02/15/11 (1)
- As I said, mean-spirited. - regmac 12:27:33 02/15/11 (0)
- RE: OK, Here's a quiz - Eric B 21:02:50 02/14/11 (0)
- RE: OK, Here's a quiz - john curl 20:35:32 02/14/11 (0)
- I glanced through it .... - Pinkus 19:33:11 02/14/11 (0)
Follow Ups
- RE: Fascinating! - lord addleford 02/16/1118:38:03 02/16/11 (0)