In Reply to: Re: Chinese Whispers? posted by bjh on March 7, 2007 at 10:05:45:
> If the reviewer took possession of those cables while representing
> Stereophile then clearly Stereophile would be on the hook for them.
I agree. But while John Curl is reasonably sure the reviewer concerned
was Jonathan Scull -- if I remember correctly -- it is not clear when
Bob Crump loaned him the cables (if he did indeed so), and if he was
working for Stereophile or not at that time.
Please note a) that Bob Crump never contacted _me_ about having these
cables returned or to complain about the matter when he was alive, and
b) that John Curl declined to give me any more information when I
asked him about this matter the last time he mentioned it on the
Asylum, and c) that John told me I should let the matter drop. Which
is why I am surprised it is still, apparently, a live issue for him.
> If that's the case then why not simply compensate Bob Crump's
> estate?; surely that would be easier than trying to wrestle
> possession away from a former reviewer and would avoid complications
> such as concerns about the present condition of the cables, etc.
_If_ it was a Stereophile reviewer, and _if_ that reviewer still has
the Crump cables, and _if_ they had been requested back, and _if_, in
that case, the reviewer had refused to return them, then yes, either
the cables can be returned (though I am not sure to whom) or they
should be paid for, although I don't even know what the value of the
cables is. If the reviewer had sold the cables, then yes, we will, of
course, pay for them.
John Atkinson
Editor, Stereophile
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Chinese Whispers? - John Atkinson 03/7/0710:28:06 03/7/07 (25)
- Re: Chinese Whispers? - John Atkinson 10:37:00 03/7/07 (0)
- Re: Chinese Whispers? - Brian Walsh 10:35:35 03/7/07 (23)
- Re: Chinese Whispers? - John Atkinson 12:49:19 03/7/07 (22)
- Re: Chinese Whispers? - john curl 15:19:52 03/7/07 (21)
- Re: Chinese Whispers? - Jonathan Scull 08:31:34 03/8/07 (0)
- Re: Chinese Whispers? - John Atkinson 06:44:49 03/8/07 (19)
- Re: Chinese Whispers? - john curl 12:47:55 03/8/07 (18)
- Re: Chinese Whispers? - Jonathan Scull 14:07:55 03/8/07 (0)
- The End of the Affair? - John Atkinson 14:05:23 03/8/07 (16)
- Re: The End of the Affair? - john curl 14:43:18 03/8/07 (15)
- Re: The End of the Affair? - John Atkinson 16:46:19 03/8/07 (14)
- Re: The End of the Affair? - jamesgarvin 14:19:48 03/9/07 (1)
- I admit it - nightdoggy 17:11:52 03/9/07 (0)
- Re: The End of the Affair? - john curl 02:03:58 03/9/07 (11)
- Re: The End of the Affair? - John Atkinson 08:49:15 03/9/07 (7)
- John, a somewhat whimsical suggestion - Brian Walsh 19:23:28 03/9/07 (6)
- It's a deal - John Atkinson 05:57:41 03/10/07 (4)
- Re: It's a deal - Brian Walsh 17:49:55 03/10/07 (3)
- Re: It's a deal - Charles Hansen 19:09:23 03/10/07 (2)
- Re: It's a deal - Brian Walsh 19:29:01 03/10/07 (1)
- Re: It's a deal - biased 22:27:00 03/13/07 (0)
- Re: John, a somewhat whimsical suggestion - john curl 01:06:06 03/10/07 (0)
- Best leave it... - bjh 05:08:12 03/9/07 (2)
- Maybe listen to your own advice... - robert young 13:28:49 03/10/07 (0)
- Re: Best leave it... - John Atkinson 14:15:21 03/9/07 (0)