|
Critic's Corner Discuss a review. Provide constructive feedback. Talk to the industry. |
|
|
|
Critic's Corner Discuss a review. Provide constructive feedback. Talk to the industry. |
|
In Reply to: No you would be wrong, the article contained just, as the previous poster put it, chinese whispers. nt posted by bjh on March 5, 2007 at 14:32:59:
> No you would be wrong, the article contained just, as the previous
> poster put it, chinese whispers.
I think you must be hard of thinking, "bjh." "Chinese Whispers" means
that the message became garbled in its passage. Yet if you compare
what Art Dudley wrote in his March issue column (available in
Stereophile's free on-line archives next Monday) with what Tom Martin
has now stated happened, you will see that Art was essentially
correct.
You may well feel that Art was out-of-line mentioning the Valin
incident, but that is both a matter of opinion and a very different
matter to accusing Art of disseminating a falsehood, which is what I
assume you mean by "Chinese Whispers."
And as Wendell Narrod asked earlier today, why _are_ you so bent out
of shape about what Art Dudley and I say and do, yet you give the
benefit of the doubt to TAS on a continual basis? Do you _work_ for
that magazine?
John Atkinson
Editor, Stereophile
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Chinese Whispers? - John Atkinson 03/7/0710:09:41 03/7/07 (1)
- Re: Chinese Whispers? - bjh 11:20:41 03/7/07 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2025, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
