In Reply to: There in lies the problem posted by theaudiohobby on September 25, 2005 at 12:30:18:
We have testimony from degreed physicists and prominent designers, as well as from the editor and staff of the respected HiFiNews & Record Review -- who are very much not given to tweak worship -- so one must wonder what will satisfy you for "independent verification"; or will you, like so many, just keep lifting the bar?clark
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- "The problem with likes of GSIC etc is that there is no independently verifiable information that it works." Huh? - clarkjohnsen 09/26/0507:59:00 09/26/05 (5)
- Re: "The problem with likes of GSIC etc is that there is no independently verifiable information that it works." Huh? - KlausR. 22:05:20 09/26/05 (2)
- "It does not work." That *is* what they said, but a far more accurate formulation would be... - clarkjohnsen 07:59:09 09/27/05 (1)
- Opinions - KlausR. 08:52:07 09/27/05 (0)
- Nope you don't read KK comments more closely. - theaudiohobby 11:24:30 09/26/05 (1)
- **you do not independently verifiable" testimony.** -- Translation, please. nt - clarkjohnsen 14:11:31 09/26/05 (0)