Critic's Corner Discuss a review. Provide constructive feedback. Talk to the industry. |
|
In Reply to: S for "Satan"? (nt) posted by Jim Austin on July 29, 2005 at 16:10:25:
W
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups Full ThreadTopic - A media critic sounds off -- criticising the media! - clarkjohnsen 08:32:06 07/27/05 (94)
- You on a history kick or what? - garth 18:13:45 07/27/05 (3)
- Very funny. BUT... - clarkjohnsen 08:07:59 07/28/05 (2)
- Honestly, just joking around. I love history. - garth 10:20:15 07/28/05 (1)
- They were invented by a fellow Dane -- but that's about all I know. nt - clarkjohnsen 13:28:17 07/28/05 (0)
- Re: A media critic sounds off -- criticising the media! - regmac 14:52:43 07/27/05 (3)
- That's $2800 per week in 2005 dollars ... - Jay 15:21:44 07/27/05 (2)
- Re: That's $2800 per week in 2005 dollars ... - three_sox 19:04:52 07/28/05 (0)
- Well that's a point... nt - clarkjohnsen 08:06:27 07/28/05 (0)
- I agree with the general sentiment, but... - Arvind Kohli 14:22:26 07/27/05 (1)
- Of course you are right, but also... - clarkjohnsen 08:05:44 07/28/05 (0)
- Hyperbole... - Jim Austin 14:01:50 07/27/05 (18)
- Re: Hyperbole... - regmac 17:15:23 07/27/05 (17)
- Speaking of the Wall Street Journal - Dave Pogue 04:42:53 07/28/05 (0)
- Not expecting anyone to study my posts... - Jim Austin 18:10:53 07/27/05 (5)
- Re: Not expecting anyone to study my posts... - regmac 19:47:46 07/27/05 (4)
- Re: Not expecting anyone to study my posts... - Jim Austin 05:51:25 07/28/05 (3)
- Time to move this to Outside? nt - addict44 11:20:29 07/28/05 (1)
- No need, I'm done. (nt) - Jim Austin 12:29:46 07/28/05 (0)
- Re: Not expecting anyone to study my posts... - regmac 08:01:57 07/28/05 (0)
- Ever notice that "left-wing" is absent from the mainstream media's lexicon? No - Norm 17:25:29 07/27/05 (9)
- Re: Ever notice that "left-wing" is absent from the mainstream media's lexicon? No - regmac 05:42:31 07/28/05 (8)
- You did not read what I said - Norm 08:40:42 07/28/05 (7)
- Re: You did not read what I said - regmac 15:37:19 07/28/05 (6)
- Re: You did not read what I said - waynes 06:26:32 07/29/05 (0)
- Most of this is unscientific - Norm 16:55:01 07/28/05 (0)
- The point is not what the personal political "leanings" of reporters are, its..... - Rick W 16:00:22 07/28/05 (3)
- Re: The point is not what the personal political "leanings" of reporters are, its..... - regmac 15:37:32 07/31/05 (2)
- Holy s#*t, what a bizarre example to use. - Rick W 07:56:12 08/1/05 (1)
- Re: Holy s#*t, what a bizarre example to use. - regmac 09:04:09 08/1/05 (0)
- Re: A media critic sounds off - lord addleford 09:38:51 07/27/05 (38)
- OK, here's the WHOLE PROBLEM - clarkjohnsen 10:37:47 07/27/05 (37)
- Re: OK, here's the WHOLE PROBLEM - May Belt 03:49:52 07/29/05 (2)
- Hey, Cryogenics works!!! - Ivan303 15:15:51 07/29/05 (0)
- Cryogenics -- excellent example! Even I had almost forgotten... nt - clarkjohnsen 13:35:36 07/29/05 (0)
- Not quite - Ross 07:12:11 07/28/05 (5)
- Quite. (Sorry, that's cutesy...) - clarkjohnsen 08:03:58 07/28/05 (4)
- My point is - Ross 10:56:27 07/28/05 (3)
- But *my* point was... - clarkjohnsen 13:41:54 07/28/05 (2)
- Not boring me at all.... - Ross 05:22:22 07/29/05 (1)
- "The information is out there for the reader to find." No doubt. - clarkjohnsen 06:44:06 07/29/05 (0)
- "..the odd foot or spike, the optical polish, the green pen... correcting for reversed polarity..." - jeromelang 18:02:02 07/27/05 (7)
- "Absolute polarity is a myth." Regrettably (for you) there are actual DBTs published in the JAES... - clarkjohnsen 07:57:58 07/28/05 (2)
- I hear it with test materials, specially created for this sort of tests. - jeromelang 05:02:15 07/29/05 (1)
- "I have not been bothered anymore by this problem." Well thas' good! - clarkjohnsen 06:53:05 07/29/05 (0)
- Inverted absolute polarity is not a myth. - markrohr 07:27:13 07/28/05 (3)
- i used to "hear" it, even compiled a demo cd with sony asking them to invert polarity of some tracks - jeromelang 04:21:45 07/29/05 (2)
- So . . . my LPs have jitter, too? nt - markrohr 06:18:27 07/29/05 (1)
- Eggs Ackley! nt - clarkjohnsen 06:54:05 07/29/05 (0)
- Stereophile has a whole section... - Jim Austin 14:09:42 07/27/05 (0)
- So why is this different than... - mkuller 13:05:02 07/27/05 (18)
- "Perhaps you don't understand the concept of 'equipment reviews'." Yes, teacher. - clarkjohnsen 07:54:56 07/28/05 (17)
- A CD player... - mkuller 12:32:54 07/28/05 (1)
- "...sold as a complete front end system." Far from a complete system, however. I rest my case. nt - clarkjohnsen 13:52:38 07/28/05 (0)
- Re: "Perhaps you refuse to understand the basics. - Dan Banquer 09:25:54 07/28/05 (0)
- Clark, I find you incredibly boring - Sue Kraft 08:19:56 07/28/05 (13)
- and completely lacking a sense of irony as well. - Bruce from DC 16:20:50 07/28/05 (5)
- Imagine me standing up for Clark... - Jim Austin 05:27:54 07/29/05 (4)
- M is for... - Robert Deutsch 06:23:17 08/2/05 (0)
- sure I could - Bruce from DC 07:29:54 07/29/05 (2)
- S for "Satan"? (nt) - Jim Austin 16:10:25 07/29/05 (1)
- "W" is the sign of the beast! - rcrump 08/4/0506:43:37 08/4/05 (0)
- "back in the trenches . . . " Gloriosky. - markrohr 12:35:08 07/28/05 (2)
- Huh? - Rick W 13:45:53 07/28/05 (1)
- Okay, repeat after me: it's . . . only . . . audio . . . ;-) - markrohr 18:06:45 07/28/05 (0)
- What if I told you, "Sue, I find you incredibly ugly-... - clarkjohnsen 08:45:17 07/28/05 (3)
- Borderline misogyny...shame on you, Clark.(nt) - mkuller 12:28:45 07/28/05 (1)
- In response to her uncalled-for rudeness, I offered a hypothetical. - clarkjohnsen 13:48:13 07/28/05 (0)
- Can't handle the truth, eh? - Sue Kraft 09:09:07 07/28/05 (0)
- Re: Circular Debate: (long) - lord addleford 09:37:12 07/27/05 (0)
- The media have been vilified always as being servants of the rich or being too liberal. - Norm 08:44:29 07/27/05 (24)
- Regarding bias... - Wellfed 09:28:00 07/27/05 (12)
- Re: Regarding bias... - Norm 12:29:58 07/27/05 (11)
- That might explain some things around here... - Wellfed 12:58:00 07/27/05 (10)
- Re: That might explain some things around here... - Norm 17:19:26 07/27/05 (9)
- Thanks for the reply Norm... - Wellfed 17:41:30 07/27/05 (8)
- Pork-barrell Republicans - Jim Austin 18:12:51 07/27/05 (7)
- Nope... - Wellfed 19:06:18 07/27/05 (6)
- I'm not interested in burying anyone... - Jim Austin 03:54:17 07/28/05 (1)
- I was kidding Jim... - Wellfed 08:32:35 07/28/05 (0)
- Democrats don't control Congress nt - Norm 20:53:17 07/27/05 (3)
- They did the last time I looked... - Wellfed 21:14:33 07/27/05 (2)
- Correction + David McCullough's 1776... - Wellfed 22:29:49 07/27/05 (1)
- I am about half way through. Very interesting and well written. nt - Norm 08:43:07 07/28/05 (0)
- Quite right. Only... - clarkjohnsen 09:21:41 07/27/05 (10)
- Re: Quite right. Only... - waynes 17:21:14 07/27/05 (5)
- Funny how those papers/networks are always used as..... - Rick W 19:29:07 07/27/05 (4)
- Re: Funny how those papers/networks are always used as..... - waynes 22:41:00 07/27/05 (3)
- The NYT didn't get to be a "paper of record" by being merely a Liberal voice. - Rick W 07:59:23 07/28/05 (2)
- Re: The NYT didn't get to be a "paper of record" by being merely a Liberal voice. - waynes 07:52:14 07/29/05 (1)
- You don't sound apolitical to me. We obviously have very different views. nt - Rick W 09:26:18 07/29/05 (1)
- Data? - Norm 12:34:26 07/27/05 (3)
- Re: "...why are tv and radio reporters a different ilk...?"... - Neil49 09:24:05 07/29/05 (0)
- Go visit any Journalism school for your answer - nt - kavakidd 19:12:17 07/28/05 (1)
- I publish in journalism journals. Data is not there. nt - Norm 20:20:26 07/28/05 (0)
Follow Ups
- "W" is the sign of the beast! - rcrump 08/4/0506:43:37 08/4/05 (0)