Home Critic's Corner

Discuss a review. Provide constructive feedback. Talk to the industry.

RE: You could - and should - do better than citing Lavry's self-serving nonsense.

Not to mention it displays some combination of dishonesty and/or ignorance, for example that conversion at 96 kHz is better than conversion at higher sampling rates because it is difficult to do accurate sampling at the higher rates. This is blatantly false, since most converters actually do their conversion a much higher sampling rates in megaHertz range and do internal downsampling if necessary to get to the desired output sample rate.

I put Lavry on my "do not buy" list because of his self-serving article.

Tony Lauck

"Diversity is the law of nature; no two entities in this universe are uniform." - P.R. Sarkar


This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
  VH Audio  


Follow Ups Full Thread
Follow Ups

FAQ

Post a Message!

Forgot Password?
Moniker (Username):
Password (Optional):
  Remember my Moniker & Password  (What's this?)    Eat Me
E-Mail (Optional):
Subject:
Message:   (Posts are subject to Content Rules)
Optional Link URL:
Optional Link Title:
Optional Image URL:
Upload Image:
E-mail Replies:  Automagically notify you when someone responds.