In Reply to: Bullshit posted by bjh on September 9, 2012 at 17:33:24:
"If you're trying to tell me that recording some song "Jackie-Ing" in a high rez format vs. Red Book results in obvious basic frequency response deviations I say you are full of it
Short’s the best position they is.Knowing that someone wouldn't believe the differences that their eyes were telling them with the spectrograms or plot spectrums and instead embrace their low resolution CD religious indoctrination. I actually listened to the 16/44.1kHz version before I deleted it. The 24/96 copy of "Jackie-Ing" has more ambiance, the piano rings out better, there is better overall flow to the music and it was way more comfortable. The 24/96 copy of the LP sounds excellent and the 16/44.1kHz copy is unacceptable, to me.
Also one other difference both the spectrograms or plot spectrums clearly show is that the cut-off frequencies at 16/44.1kHz drop-off like falling off a cliff and the 24/96 version the roll-off is very smooth all the way to 45kHz. The reason for this is analog devices usually roll-off at 6dB per octave which means almost all of them have ultrasonic response even if it is not flat. However digital devices have to drop 100dB with 2kHz which represents a couple of notes.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Your Bullshit post is complete bullshit. - Teresa 09/9/1218:21:42 09/9/12 (45)
- RE: Your Bullshit post is complete bullshit. - bjh 19:51:14 09/9/12 (44)
- Here you go - Teresa 20:17:36 09/9/12 (43)
- RE: Here you go - bjh 07:28:55 09/10/12 (7)
- RE: Here you go - Tony Lauck 11:43:13 09/10/12 (6)
- RE: Here you go - perceptiveengineering 17:28:33 09/10/12 (2)
- RE: Here you go - Tony Lauck 09:35:47 09/11/12 (1)
- RE: Here you go - perceptiveengineering 19:21:47 09/13/12 (0)
- "Screen shots of these kind of plots can lead to false conclusions." Really? - bjh 13:39:00 09/10/12 (2)
- RE: "Screen shots of these kind of plots can lead to false conclusions." Really? - Tony Lauck 14:00:17 09/10/12 (1)
- RE: "Screen shots of these kind of plots can lead to false conclusions." Really? - bjh 16:22:45 09/10/12 (0)
- RE: Here you go - J. Phelan 21:13:27 09/9/12 (34)
- You could - and should - do better than citing Lavry's self-serving nonsense. - carcass93 10:54:17 09/10/12 (8)
- RE: You could - and should - do better than citing Lavry's self-serving nonsense. - Tony Lauck 11:49:30 09/10/12 (7)
- RE: You could - and should - do better than citing Lavry's self-serving nonsense. - perceptiveengineering 20:51:27 09/10/12 (6)
- Noise to the max... - rick_m 21:43:54 09/12/12 (0)
- RE: You could - and should - do better than citing Lavry's self-serving nonsense. - Tony Lauck 08:58:07 09/11/12 (4)
- RE: You could - and should - do better than citing Lavry's self-serving nonsense. - Inmate51 07:21:41 09/12/12 (3)
- RE: You could - and should - do better than citing Lavry's self-serving nonsense. - Tony Lauck 10:15:40 09/12/12 (2)
- RE: You could - and should - do better than citing Lavry's self-serving nonsense. - perceptiveengineering 19:41:42 09/13/12 (1)
- RE: You could - and should - do better than citing Lavry's self-serving nonsense. - Tony Lauck 07:12:55 09/14/12 (0)
- Sorry, you are wrong, very wrong - Teresa 22:13:41 09/9/12 (24)
- RE: Sorry, you are wrong, very wrong - Mike Mc 23:25:58 09/9/12 (10)
- More than two points of view - Tony Lauck 07:08:27 09/10/12 (9)
- RE: More than two points of view - rick_m 07:37:07 09/10/12 (8)
- RE: More than two points of view - perceptiveengineering 21:01:39 09/10/12 (0)
- Physical media = false sense of security - Tony Lauck 09:09:43 09/10/12 (6)
- RE: Physical media = false sense of security - rick_m 13:53:42 09/10/12 (5)
- RE: Physical media = false sense of security - bjh 17:23:41 09/10/12 (4)
- RE: Physical media = false sense of security - rick_m 22:02:37 09/10/12 (2)
- RE: Physical media = false sense of security - Tony Lauck 14:57:44 09/11/12 (1)
- RE: Physical media = false sense of security - Mike Mc 15:26:30 09/11/12 (0)
- RE: Physical media = false sense of security - perceptiveengineering 21:38:01 09/10/12 (0)
- RE: Sorry, you are wrong, very wrong - J. Phelan 22:54:08 09/9/12 (12)
- You can believe lies if you want, I instead believe the truth. - Teresa 23:36:21 09/9/12 (11)
- RE: You can believe lies if you want, I instead believe the truth. - J. Phelan 23:48:09 09/9/12 (10)
- Reference to Stuart's paper? That's strike #2 - Lavry reference being #1. - carcass93 11:36:02 09/10/12 (3)
- RE: Reference to Stuart's paper? That's strike #2 - Lavry reference being #1. - perceptiveengineering 20:10:05 09/10/12 (2)
- RE: Reference to Stuart's paper? That's strike #2 - Lavry reference being #1. - J. Phelan 20:13:32 09/10/12 (1)
- RE: Reference to Stuart's paper? That's strike #2 - Lavry reference being #1. - perceptiveengineering 20:40:46 09/10/12 (0)
- Sorry I forgot to name names. - Teresa 01:05:52 09/10/12 (5)
- RE: Sorry I forgot to name names. - calloway 16:58:59 09/11/12 (2)
- Incorrect assumptions, I have heard CD on the $17,000 Playback Designs player - Teresa 17:46:50 09/11/12 (0)
- RE: Sorry I forgot to name names. - J. Phelan 17:09:41 09/11/12 (0)
- RE: Sorry I forgot to name names. - perceptiveengineering 21:28:35 09/10/12 (0)
- RE: Sorry I forgot to name names. - J. Phelan 02:09:45 09/10/12 (0)