In Reply to: There you go. posted by Kal Rubinson on January 3, 2005 at 09:47:07:
Yeah, I recognize that, and that's why I liked that part of your article. The Revel presumed reference still required me to draw the inference (or, worse, to assume your conclusion) when a few added words would have removed all doubt.Thanks again.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: There you go. - Records R Black 01/3/0511:14:19 01/3/05 (1)
- Duly noted. (NT) - Kal Rubinson 14:46:30 01/3/05 (0)