In Reply to: A reviewer would be toasting his own buns to utter those comparisons . . . posted by mr grits on January 2, 2005 at 17:41:20:
And besides, Stereophile reviews are both subjective and objective, which is one reason they're superior to the other magazines.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- How would listing the comps be toasting his buns? - Records R Black 01/3/0508:38:04 01/3/05 (6)
- I don't consider Sam Tellig's reviews 'objective' - Travis 08:47:48 01/3/05 (5)
- What really is "objective"? - mkuller 11:54:08 01/7/05 (2)
- The bench tests are subjective - Mr. Black 17:46:22 01/8/05 (0)
- Hey, I can play that game. - Travis 17:13:18 01/7/05 (0)
- Re: I don't consider Sam Tellig's reviews 'objective' - Records R Black 08:25:25 01/4/05 (1)
- Yeah, that MUST be the reason. - Travis 16:10:43 01/4/05 (0)