In Reply to: For one,..... posted by Kal Rubinson on January 3, 2005 at 08:16:39:
You're right; I went back and read that. The conclusion at the end of the piece (re: "I've reviewed many other speakers in this range...") is perfect as far as it goes (in fact, is just what I'm arguing for), except for the sole fact that the other speakers aren't named. Since I don't have your other reviews, I have to guess which speakers you're referring to or do a lot of research to find them.And since you used "speakers" I assumed you meant more than just the Revels, so as a reader I'm left with guessing which other speakers you had in mind, even if I properly assumed that you were referring to the Revels as one of those comparisons.
BTW: loved the Living Stereo reissue review.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: For one,..... - Records R Black 01/3/0508:34:29 01/3/05 (3)
- There you go. - Kal Rubinson 09:47:07 01/3/05 (2)
- Re: There you go. - Records R Black 11:14:19 01/3/05 (1)
- Duly noted. (NT) - Kal Rubinson 14:46:30 01/3/05 (0)