No need for Strunk & White! - John Marks

Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - A request for reference products - Mr. Black 21:06:29 12/31/04 (46)

There is a beast called 'echoic memory'... - Arvind Kohli 09:59:06 01/4/05 (9)

Re: There is a beast called 'echoic memory'... - Records R Black 13:20:39 01/4/05 (8)

Re: There is a beast called 'echoic memory'... - Arvind Kohli 14:15:13 01/4/05 (7)

How about taking notes ? - Pinkus 09:51:27 01/5/05 (6)

Re: How about taking notes ? - Arvind Kohli 14:32:33 01/5/05 (4)

Not taking notes ? - mkuller 11:44:19 01/7/05 (2)

Re: Not taking notes ? - Arvind Kohli 14:31:46 01/7/05 (1)

Sonic signatures... - mkuller 17:03:00 01/7/05 (0)

oooo, level matched A/B testing, tsk, tsk. - Travis 18:27:44 01/5/05 (0)

Re: How about taking notes ? - Records R Black 12:47:17 01/5/05 (0)

A reviewer would be toasting his own buns to utter those comparisons . . . - mr grits 17:41:20 01/2/05 (7)

How would listing the comps be toasting his buns? - Records R Black 08:38:04 01/3/05 (6)

I don't consider Sam Tellig's reviews 'objective' - Travis 08:47:48 01/3/05 (5)

What really is "objective"? - mkuller 11:54:08 01/7/05 (2)

The bench tests are subjective - Mr. Black 17:46:22 01/8/05 (0)

Hey, I can play that game. - Travis 17:13:18 01/7/05 (0)

Re: I don't consider Sam Tellig's reviews 'objective' - Records R Black 08:25:25 01/4/05 (1)

Yeah, that MUST be the reason. - Travis 16:10:43 01/4/05 (0)

Re: A request for reference products - MusicLover 10:56:27 01/1/05 (20)

I wish that one of the insiders would respond to this, I think it's a serious issue. - Mr. Black 19:14:07 01/1/05 (19)

Re: I wish that one of the insiders would respond to this, I think it's a serious issue. - John Atkinson 08:54:18 01/2/05 (18)

Thanks for responding - Mr. Black 22:23:53 01/2/05 (7)

Re: Thanks for responding - jamesgarvin 16:24:11 01/5/05 (1)

Oh yes, I forgot Stereo Review's normal summary. nt - Mr. Black 17:49:10 01/8/05 (0)

For one,..... - Kal Rubinson 08:16:39 01/3/05 (4)

Re: For one,..... - Records R Black 08:34:29 01/3/05 (3)

There you go. - Kal Rubinson 09:47:07 01/3/05 (2)

Re: There you go. - Records R Black 11:14:19 01/3/05 (1)

Duly noted. (NT) - Kal Rubinson 14:46:30 01/3/05 (0)

The sly and witty Mr. Atkinson is SO subtle!!!!! - John Marks 09:13:08 01/2/05 (9)

Nah...he's not that clever John...lol (nt) - jdarby 12:38:47 01/4/05 (0)

I'll pass, thanks - Mr. Black 21:31:50 01/2/05 (7)

No need for Strunk & White! - John Marks 01/3/0506:31:34 01/3/05 (6)

Re: No need for Strunk & White! - Travis 08:43:21 01/3/05 (4)

That's really an excellent point - Records R Black 08:17:02 01/4/05 (2)

I hear you, but - Travis 16:19:35 01/4/05 (1)

I suffer for my art. - nt - Records R Black 08:27:09 01/5/05 (0)

I forgot to include the URL post! - Travis 08:53:19 01/3/05 (0)

Re: No need for Strunk & White! - Records R Black 07:09:34 01/3/05 (0)

Have you taken a look at.... - mkuller 08:53:56 01/1/05 (6)

Re: Have you taken a look at.... - Mr. Black 09:31:53 01/1/05 (5)

You have a point.... - mkuller 11:16:37 01/2/05 (3)

Re: You have a point.... - Mr. Black 22:29:18 01/2/05 (2)

It's pretty easy saying.... - mkuller 13:47:30 01/7/05 (1)

Re: It's pretty easy saying.... - Travis 17:18:28 01/7/05 (0)

Re: Have you taken a look at.... - regmac 14:38:00 01/1/05 (0)

Follow Ups

No need for Strunk & White! - John Marks 01/3/0506:31:34 01/3/05 (6)

Re: No need for Strunk & White! - Travis 08:43:21 01/3/05 (4)

That's really an excellent point - Records R Black 08:17:02 01/4/05 (2)

I hear you, but - Travis 16:19:35 01/4/05 (1)

I suffer for my art. - nt - Records R Black 08:27:09 01/5/05 (0)

I forgot to include the URL post! - Travis 08:53:19 01/3/05 (0)

Re: No need for Strunk & White! - Records R Black 07:09:34 01/3/05 (0)