In Reply to: Re: I wish that one of the insiders would respond to this, I think it's a serious issue. posted by John Atkinson on January 2, 2005 at 08:54:18:
Been to Sheffield recently, have we?And, he has spared me the trouble of drafting a response to this complaint.
If you don't see his clever little thrust yet, re-read his post, and think carefully about each word.
If you need a bigger clue, email me at jmrcds@jmrcds.com
Admiringly,
JM
P.S., I don't think I have been guilty of this on a regular basis, the only exception I can think of in my career was the Plinius 8150, which I compared to separates costing twice as much, and that was not at Stereophile. What I usually end up doing is falling in love with something quite pricey, and then telling people, yes, there are cheaper soluions, but this is a "buy it once, buy it right, get off the merry-go-round (SM)" product.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- The sly and witty Mr. Atkinson is SO subtle!!!!! - John Marks 01/2/0509:13:08 01/2/05 (9)
- Nah...he's not that clever John...lol (nt) - jdarby 12:38:47 01/4/05 (0)
- I'll pass, thanks - Mr. Black 21:31:50 01/2/05 (7)
- No need for Strunk & White! - John Marks 06:31:34 01/3/05 (6)
- Re: No need for Strunk & White! - Travis 08:43:21 01/3/05 (4)
- That's really an excellent point - Records R Black 08:17:02 01/4/05 (2)
- I hear you, but - Travis 16:19:35 01/4/05 (1)
- I suffer for my art. - nt - Records R Black 08:27:09 01/5/05 (0)
- I forgot to include the URL post! - Travis 08:53:19 01/3/05 (0)
- Re: No need for Strunk & White! - Records R Black 07:09:34 01/3/05 (0)