|
Critic's Corner Discuss a review. Provide constructive feedback. Talk to the industry. |
|
|
|
Critic's Corner Discuss a review. Provide constructive feedback. Talk to the industry. |
|
In Reply to: No, I figured you were embarrassed enough. Have you figured out that one cannot prove two things to be the same yet? posted by Pat D on December 23, 2006 at 05:43:32:
don'y worry I know you won't answer this question either
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Have you figured out that no one is buying your story? - Analog Scott 12/23/0609:05:59 12/23/06 (10)
- I doubt you would admit to buying anything of mine. - Pat D 10:23:34 12/23/06 (9)
- You seem confused. do you know the difference between me and anybody?. - Analog Scott 11:05:50 12/23/06 (8)
- And ad hominem seems to be the entire substance of your arguments. - Pat D 14:03:19 12/23/06 (7)
- I'd say ad hominem seems to be the entire substance of your arguments. - Analog Scott 17:03:50 12/23/06 (6)
- Could you tell me about proving the null hypothesis. (nt) - Pat D 18:07:19 12/23/06 (5)
- Thank you for proving "ad hominem seems to be the entire substance of your arguments. " - Analog Scott 18:16:14 12/23/06 (4)
- No, the null hypothesis is substantive issue, and you refuse to tell us why you disagree with the statisticians. - Pat D 18:43:54 12/23/06 (3)
- No, the only issue is the fact that an honest answer from you would expose that old objectivist double standard - Analog Scott 09:02:22 12/24/06 (2)
- A side issue irrelevant to audio. Now, understanding the null hypothesis is important for understanding audio DBTs. - Pat D 20:08:45 12/24/06 (1)
- thank you for proving me right, again. - Analog Scott 09:37:12 12/25/06 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2025, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
