|
Critic's Corner Discuss a review. Provide constructive feedback. Talk to the industry. |
|
|
|
Critic's Corner Discuss a review. Provide constructive feedback. Talk to the industry. |
|
In Reply to: Sadly Pat D is now making things up me to deflect attention from the fact that he won't answer the questions posted by Analog Scott on December 21, 2006 at 22:51:51:
You, however, haven't explained how to prove two things are audibly the same (the null hypothesis).Pat D:
"The null hypothesis may or may not be true, but Mr. Ricker hadn't proved it and it cannot be proven with statistics, either."Analog Scott:
"Actually it can to a given point of certanty. And the accepted level of certanty by science is 95%. Good enough for science, good enough for me."http://www.audioasylum.com/forums/critics/messages/27869.html
You are clearly in error about that.
____________________________________________________________
"Nature loves to hide."
---Heraclitus of Ephesus (trans. Wheelwright)
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Didn't your Mommy teach you to tell the truth? I answered your question here. - Pat D 12/22/0606:22:39 12/22/06 (19)
- Ironic that you would question my honesty and then tell a flat out lie all in the subject line. - Analog Scott 15:12:07 12/22/06 (18)
- You just didn't like the answer I gave. Link provided, BTW. - Pat D 15:29:16 12/22/06 (17)
- baeutiful. A link to no naswer given to my question. Nice. thank you for proving me right - Analog Scott 15:56:14 12/22/06 (16)
- Nothing there, folks. Move along. (nt) - Pat D 16:11:25 12/22/06 (15)
- embarrassed? nt - Analog Scott 17:11:41 12/22/06 (14)
- Just trying to save you some embarrassment. Move along folks, nothing there. (nt) - Pat D 17:33:36 12/22/06 (13)
- Do you ever tell the truth? Seems to me you were doing everything you could to try to embarrass me - Analog Scott 17:36:07 12/22/06 (12)
- No, I figured you were embarrassed enough. Have you figured out that one cannot prove two things to be the same yet? - Pat D 05:43:32 12/23/06 (11)
- Have you figured out that no one is buying your story? - Analog Scott 09:05:59 12/23/06 (10)
- I doubt you would admit to buying anything of mine. - Pat D 10:23:34 12/23/06 (9)
- You seem confused. do you know the difference between me and anybody?. - Analog Scott 11:05:50 12/23/06 (8)
- And ad hominem seems to be the entire substance of your arguments. - Pat D 14:03:19 12/23/06 (7)
- I'd say ad hominem seems to be the entire substance of your arguments. - Analog Scott 17:03:50 12/23/06 (6)
- Could you tell me about proving the null hypothesis. (nt) - Pat D 18:07:19 12/23/06 (5)
- Thank you for proving "ad hominem seems to be the entire substance of your arguments. " - Analog Scott 18:16:14 12/23/06 (4)
- No, the null hypothesis is substantive issue, and you refuse to tell us why you disagree with the statisticians. - Pat D 18:43:54 12/23/06 (3)
- No, the only issue is the fact that an honest answer from you would expose that old objectivist double standard - Analog Scott 09:02:22 12/24/06 (2)
- A side issue irrelevant to audio. Now, understanding the null hypothesis is important for understanding audio DBTs. - Pat D 20:08:45 12/24/06 (1)
- thank you for proving me right, again. - Analog Scott 09:37:12 12/25/06 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2025, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]