|
Critic's Corner Discuss a review. Provide constructive feedback. Talk to the industry. |
|
|
|
Critic's Corner Discuss a review. Provide constructive feedback. Talk to the industry. |
|
In Reply to: You'll have to ask Stan posted by E-Stat on December 14, 2006 at 14:53:53:
EStat, so are you a believer that vynil may smooth out the digital nasties of the earlier digital recordings? I ask since you say that vinyl has inherently has higher resolution. If it does, then one would have to believe that the vinyl would also show the shortcomings of that digital master tape. That is if there isn't a roll off that smooths out such nasties. Or does vinyl somehow know the original intent of the recording?I won't debate the quality differences between early CDs and vinyl. Most of those CDs were recorded with 2nd or 3rd generation masters, if that. Many probably had been changed from D to A to D to A many many times. The 50 dollar records out now use the original master only, apply a juducious amount of eq and go. On 3rd base, basses loaded, no outs, 3 balls and no strikes. It ain't hard to make it home from there. Born To Run be darned.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: You'll have to ask Stan - Ozzie 12/14/0615:32:27 12/14/06 (8)
- i always felt that digitally recorded LPs - hifitommy 17:30:43 12/14/06 (0)
- Answer - E-Stat 17:11:05 12/14/06 (6)
- Re: Answer - Ozzie 08:01:50 12/16/06 (4)
- Sounds like we agree - E-Stat 08:15:11 12/16/06 (3)
- Re: Sounds like we agree - Ozzie 13:16:46 12/17/06 (2)
- Having heard the Soundstream 16/50 master - E-Stat 18:57:09 12/17/06 (1)
- Not having heard the Soundstream 16/50 master - Ozzie 08:19:05 12/20/06 (0)
- "'digital nasties' were a function of the early CD players". I agree. - bjh 19:06:12 12/14/06 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2025, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
