Hi, in the latest Stereophile,Jan.24 are the reviews of the Wilson Audio Specialties Sasha V at 48.900 a pair and the Klipsch 9's at !.500 a pair. Without even reading the reviews I went right to John Atkinsons measured frequency responses...page 42,figure 4 and page 81 figure 2.Which one looked better to you? Were they using the same measurement system in both reviews?....take care Mark Korda
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Topic - Wilson vs. Klipsch - mark.korda@myfairpoint.net 20:24:19 01/3/24 (17)
- JA doesn't measure distortion, but . . . - Brian H P 14:58:27 01/8/24 (5)
- RE: JA doesn't measure distortion, but . . . - Analog Scott 22:28:26 01/8/24 (4)
- that could be easily accomplished - hifitommy 21:00:00 01/14/24 (2)
- That could be easily accomplished? - Kal Rubinson 13:22:51 05/1/24 (0)
- Easily done, but still aint gonna happen - Analog Scott 04:20:17 01/15/24 (0)
- RE: JA doesn't measure distortion, but . . . - mark.korda@myfairpoint.net 09:38:27 01/9/24 (0)
- Frequency response is sooooo 30 years ago - Analog Scott 02:48:18 01/6/24 (6)
- RE: Frequency response is sooooo 30 years ago - Story 05:10:58 01/7/24 (1)
- RE: Frequency response is sooooo 30 years ago - Analog Scott 09:27:00 01/7/24 (0)
- RE: Frequency response is sooooo 30 years ago - hahax@verizon.net 20:37:32 01/6/24 (3)
- RE: Frequency response is sooooo 30 years ago - Analog Scott 00:14:14 01/7/24 (2)
- RE: Frequency response is sooooo 30 years ago - hahax@verizon.net 20:45:29 01/7/24 (1)
- RE: Frequency response is sooooo 30 years ago - Analog Scott 22:58:48 01/7/24 (0)
- RE: Wilson vs. Klipsch - hahax@verizon.net 19:46:45 01/4/24 (3)
- RE: Wilson vs. Klipsch - Analog Scott 15:33:49 01/6/24 (1)
- RE: Wilson vs. Klipsch - highendfan 17:37:17 04/30/24 (0)
- RE: Wilson vs. Klipsch - lord addleford 08:23:50 01/5/24 (0)