Home Critic's Corner

Discuss a review. Provide constructive feedback. Talk to the industry.

because it is anti-productive!

Oh my - what a stir it would make if an old piece of equipment was given a "just as great" review today.

Consider this fiction ... XYZ company 1987 amplifier is given a "great" review in the latest mag - in fact it was so "great" that is is said to "compete with many of todays newest amps" - even including XYZ own.

God Forbid!!

Who would this serve?

From a manufactorers point of view - certainly XYZ would rather have people think that the newest breed of amps are indeed "better" (hell - everyone should know that "new" = "better"), certainly XYZ would rather generate revenue (much required) by advertising & selling/moving new gear, which arguably wont happen to the same degree if the old stuff starts selling very well on e-bay, and certainly and maybe most importantly - why would XYZ want to advertise or promote a brand new line of "better" amps within the same magazine(s) that has just reviewed the older version heard to be "just as good as new".

Nope - manufactorers must move "new" gear to survive - and the magazines are a conduit for them to do just that.

TB1


This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
  VH Audio  


Follow Ups Full Thread
Follow Ups


You can not post to an archived thread.