In Reply to: No one cares what you think posted by awsmone on June 3, 2006 at 05:09:08:
"It is fruitless arguing about subjective opinions on the web or anywhere else, and on the web, lightly moderated boards like AA where folks share subjective opinions are simply a beehive of arguments. The bigger disadvantage about web boards of which AA is prime example, is that most objective opinions are shouted down for very flimsy reasons, whilst the subjective opinions of overactive imagination find support , worse still, these opinions are generally formed on the basis of very weak methodologies but the larger audience on most web are lay and generally have a very low appettite for rigorous scientific or engineering treatment which forms basis of arriving at valid objective conclusions.Charles Hansen castigation of Jim Austin and his article "Chips for Chumps" is a classic example of the common fodder you see daily n the werb. In this case Charles basically tried to lower the bar of acceptibility by claiming that Jim article was improper because he (Jim) had not personally listened to the device, casually ignoring the fact that no-one has successfully vouched for the effectiveness of the device under controlled test conditions nor have the creators of the device being able any advance credible explanation for how it works. But as expected in true internet fashion, most of the troops are lining behind Charles even though his criticism has very little merit.
Music making the painting, recording it the photograph
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Yep, it is pointless - theaudiohobby 06/3/0607:00:21 06/3/06 (58)
- Re: Yep, it is pointless - Charles Hansen 13:34:47 06/3/06 (50)
- Say what? - hexenboden 20:11:26 06/4/06 (0)
- Stuff and nonsense. - Pat D 17:25:23 06/3/06 (7)
- Uhmm... - Charles Hansen 17:30:58 06/3/06 (6)
- Do you read the posts before you misinterpret them, launch a character attack and then announce your mind is closed? - Richard BassNut Greene 14:08:56 06/5/06 (2)
- Nope -- I can do all that without bothering to read the post. [nt] - Charles Hansen 14:36:53 06/5/06 (1)
- The great danger of multi-tasking is that all the tasks are done poorly - Richard BassNut Greene 15:11:11 06/5/06 (0)
- You've really gone off the deep end. - Pat D 20:25:40 06/3/06 (2)
- It's not any one thing you said Pat, it's more - bjh 21:13:23 06/3/06 (1)
- Do you read minds now? - Pat D 14:50:16 06/4/06 (0)
- The better question is why do you defend the - bjh 15:15:01 06/3/06 (40)
- I'm sure this will be hard for you to understand - Charles Hansen 19:39:15 06/3/06 (39)
- What are "mechanical resonances of the strands"? (nt) - hexenboden 20:15:51 06/4/06 (4)
- Re: What are "mechanical resonances of the strands"? (nt) - Charles Hansen 20:26:34 06/4/06 (3)
- "You can measure it if you try." - hexenboden 14:47:38 06/5/06 (2)
- Not likely... - robert young 20:17:25 06/5/06 (1)
- Of course (nt) - hexenboden 09:47:08 06/6/06 (0)
- Re: I'm sure this will be hard for you to understand - john curl 14:24:31 06/4/06 (0)
- Ok, but Charles, you *did* know the Cardas wire..... - Rick W 10:46:55 06/4/06 (7)
- Re: Ok, but Charles, you *did* know the Cardas wire..... - hexenboden 20:18:32 06/4/06 (4)
- You have completely missed the point, which...... - Rick W 08:42:05 06/5/06 (3)
- No, you are... - hexenboden 14:40:28 06/5/06 (2)
- Amazing. Good night, and good luck. nt - Rick W 15:41:27 06/5/06 (1)
- And good night to you too. nt - hexenboden 21:27:26 06/5/06 (0)
- Oh, don't play dense just for the sake of argument - Charles Hansen 12:43:14 06/4/06 (1)
- LOL. Yeah, we wouldn't want to require tweaks to come up to the lowest common denominator. nt - Rick W 14:04:05 06/4/06 (0)
- Re: Is Tweaking Still Alive & Kicking? - geoffkait 04:23:14 06/4/06 (0)
- Re: I'm sure this will be hard for you to understand - May Belt 02:40:24 06/4/06 (2)
- Shorter posts might be read (nt) - hexenboden 20:19:37 06/4/06 (0)
- "Ridicule, ridicule, ridicule." All the attackers employ that smarmy technique in their "debunking". - clarkjohnsen 12:05:42 06/4/06 (0)
- Mr Hansen let me tell you something ... - bjh 20:56:21 06/3/06 (20)
- I hate to butt in - unclestu52 01:18:49 06/4/06 (4)
- "The so called 'scientific' minds automatically dismiss... and never investigate any further." LOL! - clarkjohnsen 11:53:26 06/4/06 (1)
- Why should they? The burden of proof is on those who claim something works. - Pat D 10:05:27 06/5/06 (0)
- Well said. nt - Norm 09:19:14 06/4/06 (1)
- Indeed! (mt) - Stephæn 10:12:11 06/4/06 (0)
- What's the craziest thing you ever spent $40.00 on? - J-PMatt@Comcast.Net 01:03:59 06/4/06 (11)
- "So why do I choose to dismiss the GSIC?" Because Jim Austin told you to? nt - clarkjohnsen 11:55:54 06/4/06 (4)
- Who the hell is Jim Austin???????????? - J-PMatt@Comcast.Net 15:41:33 06/4/06 (1)
- Exactly. [nt] - Charles Hansen 15:42:42 06/4/06 (0)
- That's right -- after all, he has a PhD. He has to be right. [nt] - Charles Hansen 12:38:26 06/4/06 (1)
- And well-educated as he is, you'll never catch him with a Chip on his shoulder... nt - clarkjohnsen 13:04:30 06/4/06 (0)
- I didn't buy it, - unclestu52 11:20:26 06/4/06 (0)
- "I'll bet you $50.00 they make the drinks taste better!" Use "prayed over" water for mix just to be certain! - bjh 06:17:08 06/4/06 (4)
- Now you're talking!!! I wonder if prayed over ice cubes - J-PMatt@Comcast.Net 08:04:32 06/4/06 (3)
- Re: Now you're talking!!! I wonder if prayed over ice cubes - bjh 08:53:52 06/4/06 (2)
- Re: Now you're talking!!! I wonder if prayed over ice cubes - J-PMatt@Comcast.Net 19:09:05 06/4/06 (1)
- I dunno ... the competition tells folks - bjh 20:41:45 06/4/06 (0)
- Almost agree (surprise!) - Charles Hansen 22:14:39 06/3/06 (2)
- Why listen... - Wellfed 12:32:53 06/4/06 (1)
- I had almost forgotten! nt - clarkjohnsen 13:06:37 06/4/06 (0)
- "[No] credible explanation for how it works." Hmm... - clarkjohnsen 08:16:24 06/3/06 (5)
- Clark, why don't you just tell us... - KlausR. 10:10:22 06/3/06 (4)
- And you deserve to know, why, exactly? (After the way you've behaved...) nt - clarkjohnsen 11:43:12 06/4/06 (3)
- Is that "I can't tell you" or "I won't tell you" ? nt - KlausR. 08:27:27 06/6/06 (2)
- More like, "Why bother?" nt - clarkjohnsen 08:49:54 06/6/06 (1)
- Because fora are intended to share knowledge, not to say " I know but I won't tell you, go and find out yourself" - KlausR. 10:03:08 06/6/06 (0)
- Re: Yep, it is pointless - Jim Austin 07:39:00 06/3/06 (0)