Home Critic's Corner

Discuss a review. Provide constructive feedback. Talk to the industry.

That's exactly right

> I could be wrong, and I have no idea of how John Atkinson would state
> the case, but personally, I parse the "We" in Stereophile's "As We See
> It" in neither the "Royal We" sense, nor as a conformist/corporate
> "We," but rather as a collection of individual viewpoints appearance
> *ad hoc* as individual writers feel led. The "We" would then simply be
> "we individuals here at Stereophile."

Thank you Dave. The "As We See It" is akin to a serial presentation of
op-ed pieces. The only ones where it is clear that an editorial policy
or point of guidance is being made are when I write an essay and make
it clear that I am speaking on behalf of the magazine.

I guess the "As We See it"concept started to change when Gordon Holt
started to invite other writers to contribnute essays, back in the
1970s.

I note that Charlie Hansen disagrees with you on this, but as
Stereophile's editor, I would have thought that my definition wins
on trumps :-)

I should also note that I don't believe Charlie is getting rich on
selling the equivalent of chips to chumps. You can find my opinion
of Charlie's abilities in the mid-May Stereophile eNewsletter, BTW.
(Though this has not yet been archived on our website.)

John Atkinson
Editor, Stereophile





This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
  VH Audio  


Follow Ups Full Thread
Follow Ups
  • That's exactly right - John Atkinson 05/31/0617:52:55 05/31/06 (0)


You can not post to an archived thread.