In Reply to: One very weak response posted by Norm on May 28, 2006 at 20:44:33:
> > You seem to think you are the scam police. If you don't see your self as one of the self-righteous missionaries of pseudo science who are going to save poor deluded souls from themselves, you are the only one. < <Norm, once again you presume to speak for everyone, claiming that I "am the only one"--as if you speak for all the others. What is up with that? Your words don't describe some concensus opinion; it's just you.
> > I don't think anyone is impressed by your missives, but I again think I am not alone in wishing you would not seek to save us from ourselves. Who asked you to do so? < <
I guess one answer to that question is that John Atkinson asked me if he could publish that essay after I showed it to him, so maybe he's your man. But really, what I write I write for myself. I'm not interested in saving anyone. But I do care about audio and I do what I can. When I think something cheapens the industry/hobby, I speak what I take to be the truth. People can read it, enjoy it, laugh at it, burn it, wrap fish in it, or frame it and put it on their wall. Naturally I think people will respond positively to what I write--and many do--but I don't expect concensus and I'm not interested in deciding what people think or do. I've done an honest job; let the chips fall where they may.
By the way I re-read "Chips for Chumps" last night and I think I nailed it. If you want to know why people are pissed off, read it for the deeper message: audio companies/designers are like artists in the sense that, if they were to try to make a living by selling only to people who really "get it," they'd go broke. They've got to appeal to the broad swath of the population with more money than sense or expertise. And one way they do this is by encouraging people to "just listen" and "trust their ears"--because they realize that the power of suggestion is like money in the bank.
Beginners can no more trust their ears than they should trust their ability to strike out Manny Ramirez, perform heart surgery, or tell a wine from one vinyard from one just down the street. It takes a lot of focused time and effort to develop that degree of discernment--and no, I don't claim to be a guru, just that I am taking it seriously and working diligently to acquire that expertise. I hope that anyone who reads what I write about audio will be aware of where I'm coming from: that I'm serious, technically informed (in the fundamentals but not, eg, the details of circuit design), and I listen hard.
Jim
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: One very weak response - Jim Austin 05/29/0604:30:06 05/29/06 (12)
- Of course, I am speaking for myself, as are you. - Norm 05:55:39 05/29/06 (8)
- Science? - John Atkinson 10:21:44 05/29/06 (7)
- More examples - Charles Hansen 15:01:21 05/29/06 (1)
- When audio engineers go bad - Jim Austin 16:30:04 05/29/06 (0)
- "Well argued"? - Charles Hansen 12:25:32 05/29/06 (1)
- You still have that imaginary bridge huh? - bjh 12:40:13 05/29/06 (0)
- You will seldom see scientist using such loaded words - Norm 11:47:43 05/29/06 (2)
- I was taught to say "weighted words", but yes -- the ol' appeal to the emotions usually wins the masses. nt - clarkjohnsen 09:20:46 05/30/06 (1)
- Maybe another regional difference nt - Norm 12:06:21 05/30/06 (0)
- One very weak response redux - Charles Hansen 05:28:07 05/29/06 (2)
- Re: One very weak response redux - Jim Austin 08:45:51 05/29/06 (1)
- Re: One very weak response redux - Charles Hansen 12:11:01 05/29/06 (0)