Thank you Rick--and--especially--BJH - Jim Austin

Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - Tickling your toes improves your hearing (Jim Austin, Mrs. Belt)??? - KlausR. 05:07:39 05/23/06 (120)

All kidding aside... - LarryB 13:09:09 05/24/06 (16)

Re: All kidding aside... - Charles Hansen 15:23:23 05/24/06 (15)

Charles - LarryB 10:23:47 05/26/06 (5)

Sorry if I wasn't clear - Charles Hansen 10:42:17 05/26/06 (4)

Surely you jest Mr. Hansen! - bjh 14:14:29 05/26/06 (2)

Re: Surely you jest Mr. Hansen! - Charles Hansen 09:38:23 05/27/06 (1)

"Sorry to disappoint you in your quest to make me look silly" Mr. Hansen - bjh 09:43:01 05/27/06 (0)

Rest assured... - LarryB 13:43:48 05/26/06 (0)

Of course....... - Kal Rubinson 17:13:28 05/24/06 (8)

Re: Of course....... - Jim Austin 17:52:37 05/24/06 (7)

Re: Of course....... - Kal Rubinson 18:51:14 05/24/06 (6)

I find myself supremely unqualified - Bruce Kendall 18:57:01 05/24/06 (5)

Wikipedia to the rescue - Charles Hansen 20:19:51 05/24/06 (4)

What nature doesn't provide, Wikipedia won't lend (nt) - hexenboden 10:15:13 05/26/06 (0)

Nice. - Kal Rubinson 07:00:32 05/25/06 (1)

Thanks - Charles Hansen 08:01:35 05/25/06 (0)

Thanks, Charles. But when Google came out I rid myself - Bruce Kendall 20:38:17 05/24/06 (0)

I would invite all to examine Jim Austin's - bjh 13:07:47 05/24/06 (9)

Examined. The suggestion contradicts decades of audiophile (human) experiences, so is hard to believe. - Richard BassNut Greene 10:19:30 05/26/06 (6)

Not exclusively ... - bjh 15:02:06 05/26/06 (2)

A movie of bjh "toe-tapping", "finger-snapping", "air-guitaring", "swaying-to-beat", "getting-down&qu - Richard BassNut Greene 23:25:49 05/27/06 (1)

Why Richard it seems you'd be as poor a Film Producer as - bjh 07:29:14 05/28/06 (0)

Thanks for the fresh air (nt) - hexenboden 10:31:43 05/26/06 (2)

bjh would probably say "hot air" , ... but what does he know? - Richard BassNut Greene 23:16:00 05/27/06 (1)

He's certainly full of air ;) (nt) - hexenboden 13:19:02 05/28/06 (0)

Agree 100%. Some people are always on the lookout for fodder to feed their sad-ass vendettas. nt - Rick W 16:48:08 05/24/06 (1)

Thank you Rick--and--especially--BJH - Jim Austin 05/24/0617:55:42 05/24/06 (0)

I've dated a few apes in my time - Sue Kraft 06:14:26 05/24/06 (5)

A female acquaintance of mine likes to go to the zoo... - andy_c 11:19:16 05/24/06 (3)

they do it because they can - Sue Kraft 11:44:00 05/24/06 (2)

Come on... - mkuller 11:09:24 05/26/06 (1)

okay, but no promises - Sue Kraft 12:00:18 05/26/06 (0)

Did you tickle their "toes"? - Richard BassNut Greene 07:50:43 05/24/06 (0)

Was there anything said about effect should one Shock The Monkey? nt - bjh 18:35:27 05/23/06 (1)

Have you emailed Peter Gabriel? - Bruce Kendall 19:04:27 05/23/06 (0)

So tickle a monkeys toes to get better sound? - Kloss 15:09:15 05/23/06 (1)

Yeah, for the monkeys (nt) - Jim Austin 18:44:23 05/23/06 (0)

By the way... - Jim Austin 07:54:13 05/23/06 (60)

So, would this "increased activity in the secondary auditory cortex" be like... - Enophile 08:58:22 05/25/06 (1)

The take-home message, I think... - Jim Austin 09:05:00 05/25/06 (0)

Re: By the way... - May Belt 09:59:50 05/23/06 (55)

Macaques and toe-tickling - KlausR. 01:36:51 05/24/06 (7)

Re: Macaques and toe-tickling - Jim Austin 04:22:01 05/24/06 (6)

Re: Macaques and toe-tickling - KlausR. 04:59:19 05/24/06 (5)

Re: Macaques and toe-tickling - Jim Austin 05:27:06 05/24/06 (4)

Not exact quote sbut... - KlausR. 07:03:24 05/24/06 (3)

Klaus, you are amazing - Charles Hansen 08:20:20 05/24/06 (1)

Yeah, ain't it weird? Hats off to Klaus! nt - clarkjohnsen 08:30:41 05/24/06 (1)

You have finally offered one criticism... - Jim Austin 07:20:10 05/24/06 (0)

Re: By the way... - Jim Austin 10:10:46 05/23/06 (46)

Re: By the way... - May Belt 13:34:22 05/23/06 (45)

Re: By the way... - Jim Austin 13:48:32 05/23/06 (44)

Re: By the way... - May Belt 03:02:16 05/24/06 (43)

Re: By the way... - Jim Austin 03:52:46 05/24/06 (42)

Re: By the way... - May Belt 12:25:24 05/24/06 (41)

It's not science - Jim Austin 13:06:22 05/24/06 (40)

Re: It's not science - Steve L. 10:13:06 05/26/06 (7)

Re: Unaddressed issue, - theaudiohobby 06:38:49 06/2/06 (0)

Good Science - hexenboden 14:04:05 05/31/06 (2)

Re: Good Science - Steve L. 14:20:39 05/31/06 (1)

True (nT) - hexenboden 14:25:46 05/31/06 (0)

Re: It's not science - john curl 14:34:24 05/26/06 (0)

Nice post -- thanks. [nt] - Charles Hansen 10:45:14 05/26/06 (1)

Re: Nice post -- thanks. [nt] - john curl 20:50:28 05/27/06 (0)

You still don't get it (no surprise, I guess) - Charles Hansen 15:16:19 05/24/06 (5)

Two days later and still nothing. Poor guy must ne mortified. nt - clarkjohnsen 08:36:38 05/26/06 (3)

No, I'm not prince Hamlet... - Jim Austin 11:15:49 05/26/06 (2)

Meanwhile, back to the topic..............................nt - clarkjohnsen 07:13:47 05/27/06 (1)

More like ... back to the funny farm. :) nt - bjh 08:04:11 05/27/06 (0)

These would seem to be unassailable criticisms, but we'll see, we'll see. nt - clarkjohnsen 08:17:29 05/25/06 (0)

Re: It's not science - John Atkinson 13:48:27 05/24/06 (25)

Are we to intrepret your lack of response to Hansen's claims/POV as acquiescence? Perhaps - bjh 11:41:34 05/25/06 (2)

No, had other things to do yesterday (NT) - John Atkinson 04:06:16 05/26/06 (0)

I'll take that as a ... No. :) nt - bjh 19:14:14 05/25/06 (0)

Re: It's not science - Charles Hansen 15:38:13 05/24/06 (0)

Re: It's not science - Jim Austin 15:31:57 05/24/06 (5)

Once again you are demonstrating your lack of reading skills - Charles Hansen 15:51:33 05/24/06 (4)

"I have no idea if the Intelligent Chip works or not." - Rick W 20:11:03 05/24/06 (3)

Re: "I have no idea if the Intelligent Chip works or not." - Charles Hansen 20:55:02 05/24/06 (2)

OK, let *me* say it: - clarkjohnsen 08:26:42 05/25/06 (0)

Charles, we finally agree (except the tubes reference). That's why I'm underwhelmed too . nt - Rick W 21:01:53 05/24/06 (0)

Re: It's not science - john curl 14:48:18 05/24/06 (14)

Clarification - John Atkinson 06:37:16 05/25/06 (13)

What a crock. - Ozzie 12:41:05 05/27/06 (4)

Please read up on "fair use" - John Atkinson 05:31:11 05/28/06 (3)

Fair use, huh? - Ozzie 16:56:21 05/29/06 (2)

Fair use - John Atkinson 08:05:34 05/30/06 (1)

Re: Fair use - Ozzie 11:09:59 05/30/06 (0)

Re: Clarification - john curl 12:07:51 05/25/06 (0)

Re: Clarification - Charles Hansen 07:43:26 05/25/06 (6)

Another crock. - Rick W 08:51:35 05/25/06 (5)

Re: Another crock. - Charles Hansen 09:10:27 05/25/06 (2)

Confusion in this thread - hexenboden 21:53:40 05/25/06 (0)

Wishful thinking ... - bjh 10:23:22 05/25/06 (0)

Don't forget - Ken Perkins 09:08:25 05/25/06 (1)

LOL. Didn't remember that. Dammit, I hate missing out on easy money. nt - Rick W 09:26:44 05/25/06 (0)

Re: "Is this all the Belts have been claiming all along?" - geoffkait 08:44:13 05/23/06 (1)

Are you saying that... - Jim Austin 09:09:55 05/23/06 (0)

Re: Tickling your toes improves your hearing (Jim Austin, Mrs. Belt)??? - Jim Austin 07:43:02 05/23/06 (17)

Jim, I have to disagree! - KlausR. 00:16:58 05/24/06 (16)

Re: Jim, I have to disagree! - Jim Austin 04:06:17 05/24/06 (15)

Jim, then please explain why... - KlausR. 04:44:03 05/24/06 (14)

Re: Jim, then please explain why... - Jim Austin 05:24:24 05/24/06 (13)

It was "News Desk" in S'phile... - KlausR. 06:50:35 05/24/06 (12)

Do you believe... - Jim Austin 07:15:45 05/24/06 (11)

Re: Do you believe... - KlausR. 08:30:08 05/24/06 (0)

Austin, you are truly a weasel - Charles Hansen 08:13:00 05/24/06 (9)

I find this rather tasteless - hexenboden 22:12:28 05/25/06 (0)

Re: Austin, you are truly a weasel - Jim Austin 08:20:12 05/24/06 (7)

wow - Sue Kraft 10:41:51 05/24/06 (1)

I think... - kerr 11:09:49 05/24/06 (0)

Hopkins vs Tarver, HBO June 10th ... - TBone 10:09:06 05/24/06 (0)

Re: Austin, you are truly a weasel - Charles Hansen 08:24:23 05/24/06 (3)

Re: Austin, you are truly a weasel - anthonyh 10:15:03 05/24/06 (2)

Re: Austin, you are truly a weasel - Charles Hansen 12:57:08 05/24/06 (1)

"There is absolutely no defensible argument for including this editorial ..." - bjh 14:35:14 05/24/06 (0)

Any update on the speaker enclosure internal standing waves issue? - bjh 07:22:55 05/23/06 (3)

the worst internal standing waves would be inside an unstuffed spherical speaker enclosure - Richard BassNut Greene 10:33:07 05/23/06 (1)

Might I suggest you study the threads - bjh 11:11:47 05/23/06 (0)

Re: Any update on the speaker enclosure internal standing waves issue? - KlausR. 08:59:52 05/23/06 (0)

Follow Ups

Thank you Rick--and--especially--BJH - Jim Austin 05/24/0617:55:42 05/24/06 (0)