In Reply to: RE: Over on the goN is a question: Why is there no Stereophile review of Magnepan 3.7? posted by tmsorosk on July 31, 2011 at 06:25:02:
I doubt it would be a bad review, the 3.7 has gotten nothing but raves. I do recall Wendell being quoted as having said that they don't measure well, though. Hard to get a good waterfall off a speaker with a large area, and the bass of a dipole looks funny measured up close. I thought at the time I read that that most readers would know enough to see past the measurements given an explanation, but posts I've seen since then suggest to me that it was a valid concern.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Over on the goN is a question: Why is there no Stereophile review of Magnepan 3.7? - josh358 08/6/1118:15:51 08/6/11 (2)
- RE: Over on the goN is a question: Why is there no Stereophile review of Magnepan 3.7? - tmsorosk 18:23:09 08/6/11 (1)
- RE: Over on the goN is a question: Why is there no Stereophile review of Magnepan 3.7? - josh358 18:37:22 08/6/11 (0)