In Reply to: Re: Chinese Whispers? posted by john curl on March 7, 2007 at 15:19:52:
> I am sorry that this has come up again. I don't want restitution of
> Bob's cables, but in principle it is much the same situation that JV
> is accused of, and apparently the cable company has been compensated
> in that instance, by TAS.
I get your point, John. _My_ point is that when I did phone you to
offer to resolve this matter, you told me that it was a closed
issue for you. You told me that though you remember that it was
Jonathan Scull who was the reviewer involved, you didn't know what
cables had been sent him, you didn't know when they had been sent,
you didn't know what the value of the cables was, and that you
couldn't tell me anything more. You concluded the conversation by
telling me that I should forget about it.
> I might note that I did not publically bring out the reviewer's
> name (JS) on this website, but told you privately, because I did
> not want to embarrass your magazine or the former reviewer > specifically...
And I told you that those were not concerns of mine, that if what
you were saying was correct, I would like to sort it out.
> I still wanted to make the point that being very high-minded means
> that one's situation must be pristine in order to accuse others of
> malfeasance.
A good point, of course, but I fail to understand why you are
condemning Stereophile for poor behavior when it was you, yourself,
John, who told me _not_ to bother when I offered to resolve the
matter last July. In addition, I am not a mindreader. If you and the
late Bob Crump were so upset by what happened, why didn't either of
you contact me at the time? Why did you wait several years to raise
this matter in public?
> I don't think that dragging stuff up like this out helps anyone.
So why did you raise it, John? You told me when I offered to resolve
the matter that it was a closed issue for you. Obviously it was not.
And now you are criticizing me for _not_ resolving it? Pshaw.
John Atkinson
Editor, Stereophile
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Chinese Whispers? - John Atkinson 03/8/0706:44:49 03/8/07 (19)
- Re: Chinese Whispers? - john curl 12:47:55 03/8/07 (18)
- Re: Chinese Whispers? - Jonathan Scull 14:07:55 03/8/07 (0)
- The End of the Affair? - John Atkinson 14:05:23 03/8/07 (16)
- Re: The End of the Affair? - john curl 14:43:18 03/8/07 (15)
- Re: The End of the Affair? - John Atkinson 16:46:19 03/8/07 (14)
- Re: The End of the Affair? - jamesgarvin 14:19:48 03/9/07 (1)
- I admit it - nightdoggy 17:11:52 03/9/07 (0)
- Re: The End of the Affair? - john curl 02:03:58 03/9/07 (11)
- Re: The End of the Affair? - John Atkinson 08:49:15 03/9/07 (7)
- John, a somewhat whimsical suggestion - Brian Walsh 19:23:28 03/9/07 (6)
- It's a deal - John Atkinson 05:57:41 03/10/07 (4)
- Re: It's a deal - Brian Walsh 17:49:55 03/10/07 (3)
- Re: It's a deal - Charles Hansen 19:09:23 03/10/07 (2)
- Re: It's a deal - Brian Walsh 19:29:01 03/10/07 (1)
- Re: It's a deal - biased 22:27:00 03/13/07 (0)
- Re: John, a somewhat whimsical suggestion - john curl 01:06:06 03/10/07 (0)
- Best leave it... - bjh 05:08:12 03/9/07 (2)
- Maybe listen to your own advice... - robert young 13:28:49 03/10/07 (0)
- Re: Best leave it... - John Atkinson 14:15:21 03/9/07 (0)