In Reply to: I'm not trying to be an antagonist here, posted by Bruce Kendall on March 7, 2007 at 11:58:11:
Readers should play NO ROLE (geez) that wasn't the point. The point is that the publishers answer to this issue concludes with what a nice industry it is and how the mags are friends with the mfgs. And it's in THAT circle that the reader is left out. Who gives a damn--(what reader interested in getting the best equipment for the money--readers not interested in that can stop here)-- about friendships between reviewers and the people that make the stuff they review? You say you aren't trying to be an antagonist. I say that's exactly what it looks like to me. If you are a reader who is part of the CLUB, which some are here, which you may be, I don't know. Or if you are a reader who has lots of money to spend, then hey, it doesn't apply. But I would much prefer a mag where the writers were not chums with the makers, where the writers took the readers' needs into account. Or where the writers were not at the mercy of the mfgs for expensive equipment to review. Honesty factors into this somewhere. That there should be something equivalent to fiduciary responsibility of mags to paying readers is what I want. I don't see that in so many of the discussions here. It makes me sick.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: I'm not trying to be an antagonist here, - TomLarson 03/7/0716:18:59 03/7/07 (14)
- no gifts, no accomodation will result in better reviews - jdouglas51 09:33:12 03/8/07 (2)
- Re: no gifts, no accomodation will result in better reviews - john curl 13:58:24 03/8/07 (1)
- Re: no gifts, no accomodation will result in better reviews - jdouglas51 06:24:17 03/9/07 (0)
- no gifts, no accomodation will result in better reviews - jdouglas51 09:31:21 03/8/07 (1)
- I agree. And that day doesn't sound like it's going to happen. nt - TomLarson 11:29:01 03/8/07 (0)
- That is quite a mouthful. - Bruce Kendall 19:46:56 03/7/07 (4)
- Re: That is quite a mouthful. - TomLarson 07:54:09 03/8/07 (3)
- My interpretation of the explanation given is - Bruce Kendall 10:52:09 03/8/07 (2)
- Re: My interpretation of the explanation given is - TomLarson 11:27:10 03/8/07 (1)
- Thanks, Tom. - Bruce Kendall 11:46:30 03/8/07 (0)
- Consumer Reports audio equipment reviews are for you...(nt) - mkuller 18:33:34 03/7/07 (3)
- Re: Consumer Reports audio equipment reviews are for you...(nt) - TomLarson 11:42:06 03/8/07 (2)
- Ahhh...youthful idealism... - mkuller 11:55:14 03/8/07 (1)
- Re: Ahhh...youthful idealism... - TomLarson 16:23:18 03/8/07 (0)