Home Critic's Corner

Discuss a review. Provide constructive feedback. Talk to the industry.

Maybe because...

you argue from both sides of your mouth, Klaus.

I understood what you were saying. My point was that, like current improvements in redbook playback, it is the work of inventors with ears who work to overcome the basic flaws in the medium.

The concept of a groove cut into a turning (rotating or revolving) medium didn't come from engineers with charts. It came from inventors (Edison first, not a lab-coated member of the JAES). If you really believe your position, then I suggest you read your charts, and I'll listen to music.

You had your grammer right, you're just changing your position. And yes, vinyl would have been bashed, not because it sounds different, but because in your scenario, it would have claimed "perfect sound forever." The maker of such a claim deserves to be bashed.

Ah, let's try a little slight under-the-radar slap at Schroeder! Regardless of your patent office, he hass pushed the knnown limits of tonearm performance to new levels. If he wasn't the inventor, that doesnt change the fact that he applied the idea better than anyone else has. Patents, like charts, don't have anything to do with listening to music. If you tried that line of thought, you might find some new joy in music.

Given the nature of your posts (and I use the word "nature" with regret), I think you will finally achieve audio nirvana when your brain can process a digital signal without the evil intervention of a DAC.

Good luck to you.




This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
  Atma-Sphere Music Systems, Inc.  


Follow Ups Full Thread
Follow Ups


You can not post to an archived thread.