![]() |
Critic's Corner Discuss a review. Provide constructive feedback. Talk to the industry. |
|
In Reply to: Some things transcend gender, posted by bjh on November 18, 2017 at 09:49:09:
nt
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups Full ThreadTopic - Stereophile speaker of the year - J. Phelan 18:37:59 11/16/17 (53)
- RE: Stereophile speaker of the year - FSonicSmith 10:28:45 11/21/17 (6)
- RE: Stereophile speaker of the year - John Atkinson 04:33:04 11/22/17 (0)
- RE: Stereophile speaker of the year - J. Phelan 11:19:37 11/21/17 (4)
- RE: Stereophile speaker of the year - Krav Maga 12:56:49 11/21/17 (3)
- RE: Stereophile speaker of the year - J. Phelan 15:16:21 11/21/17 (2)
- RE: Stereophile speaker of the year - Krav Maga 16:26:35 11/21/17 (1)
- RE: Stereophile speaker of the year - J. Phelan 16:44:37 11/21/17 (0)
- An ode to irony - Krav Maga 22:32:00 11/19/17 (1)
- No irony: O/96 just has a longer-than-typical break in time (nt) - Steve O 09:51:04 11/20/17 (0)
- RE: Stereophile speaker of the year - FSonicSmith 17:04:19 11/19/17 (2)
- RE: Stereophile speaker of the year - J. Phelan 20:05:41 11/19/17 (1)
- RE: Stereophile speaker of the year - FSonicSmith 11:48:01 11/20/17 (0)
- RE: Stereophile speaker of the year - Krav Maga 15:29:51 11/17/17 (0)
- I'm glad the O/96 was recognized... - Ladok 10:26:14 11/17/17 (0)
- Do any of these "awards" really matter to you? - Rick W 09:20:02 11/17/17 (20)
- Not really... - Steve O 10:49:25 11/17/17 (19)
- "to the less secure out there"... - mkuller 14:11:21 11/17/17 (18)
- Glad I'm not an audiophile - 4everyoung 18:18:25 11/17/17 (17)
- Me, too... - mkuller 10:02:32 11/18/17 (1)
- LOL ..."Hi, my name is Mike.........." (nt) - Steve O 10:39:59 11/18/17 (0)
- RE: Glad I'm not an audiophile - Wojciech 20:27:08 11/17/17 (14)
- I should have said - 4everyoung 13:33:30 11/18/17 (5)
- "Interpretation is the critics revenge on Art."-nT - Cleantimestream 20:11:16 11/18/17 (4)
- High end audio is science, not art. - 4everyoung 20:50:32 11/18/17 (3)
- RE: High end audio is science, not art. - Cleantimestream 07:32:23 11/21/17 (0)
- Science defines the box we play in. Art is what we do with that box. nt - stehno 15:56:04 11/19/17 (0)
- There's an art to putting old wine in new bottles and hyping it as the latest and greatest. It... - regmac 07:50:45 11/19/17 (0)
- Some things transcend gender, - bjh 09:49:09 11/18/17 (1)
- Why unfortunately? (nt) - 4everyoung 11/18/1711:10:44 11/18/17 (0)
- uh-oh (nt) - Steve O 20:31:50 11/17/17 (5)
- Indeed. That's as dicey as genuine fur coats. (nt) - regmac 09:10:25 11/18/17 (4)
- More so in today's highly sensitized environment (nt) - Steve O 10:26:52 11/18/17 (3)
- No more helping little old ladies across the street - 4everyoung 14:10:36 11/18/17 (2)
- In 1971, as a college freshman, I made the mistake of opening a door for a bespectacled, mousey brunette, who - regmac 16:59:12 11/19/17 (0)
- Well, maybe due caution with unsolicited help but if asked I certainly would (nt) - Steve O 15:03:13 11/18/17 (0)
- I suspect illicit vaping. * - Billy Wonka 20:16:18 11/16/17 (0)
- RE: Stereophile speaker of the year - PAR 19:42:24 11/16/17 (16)
- Things that make you go hmmm. - Krav Maga 12:12:22 11/17/17 (0)
- RE: Stereophile speaker of the year - J. Phelan 05:27:50 11/17/17 (6)
- RE: Stereophile speaker of the year - John Atkinson 06:54:15 11/17/17 (5)
- RE: Stereophile speaker of the year - J. Phelan 10:12:00 11/17/17 (4)
- RE: Stereophile speaker of the year - John Atkinson 10:17:09 11/17/17 (3)
- RE: Stereophile speaker of the year - BubbaMike 11:03:55 11/17/17 (0)
- RE: Stereophile speaker of the year - J. Phelan 10:35:22 11/17/17 (1)
- RE: Stereophile speaker of the year - John Atkinson 07:03:39 11/19/17 (0)
- RE: Stereophile speaker of the year - John Atkinson 04:11:36 11/17/17 (7)
- Previous Winners Aren't Eligible - Inmate51 08:13:00 11/22/17 (6)
- RE: Previous Winners Aren't Eligible - John Atkinson 04:08:01 11/23/17 (3)
- RE: Previous Winners Aren't Eligible (stupidly long) - Charles Hansen 11:57:44 11/24/17 (2)
- RE: Previous Winners Aren't Eligible (stupidly long) - John Atkinson 12:57:23 11/24/17 (1)
- RE: Previous Winners Aren't Eligible (stupidly long) - Charles Hansen 16:43:26 11/24/17 (0)
- RE: Previous Winners Aren't Eligible - Charles Hansen 14:43:43 11/22/17 (1)
- RE: Previous Winners Aren't Eligible - FSonicSmith 15:41:23 11/22/17 (0)
Follow Ups
- Why unfortunately? (nt) - 4everyoung 11/18/1711:10:44 11/18/17 (0)