In Reply to: Stereophile speaker of the year posted by J. Phelan on November 16, 2017 at 18:37:59:
But it did win its own category. Or, more precisely, it won jointly with the Wilson Alexx. The overall product of the year was the Kii Audio 3.
The odd thing is that the DeVore was reviewed again within the 2016/17 year which made it eligible for inclusion, the original review having been as you say, in 2012.
The 2017 review of the O/96 was not a full one but a "Follow Up" which in Stereophile normally means that the original review required expansion as some aspect of the component was unable to be explored originally or where it had been updated subsequently. Neither aspect appears to have been the cause of Jim Austin's 2017 review, merely the fact that he had got a pair. By that token the same product could feasibly become a category winner every year.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Stereophile speaker of the year - PAR 11/16/1719:42:24 11/16/17 (16)
- Things that make you go hmmm. - Krav Maga 12:12:22 11/17/17 (0)
- RE: Stereophile speaker of the year - J. Phelan 05:27:50 11/17/17 (6)
- RE: Stereophile speaker of the year - John Atkinson 06:54:15 11/17/17 (5)
- RE: Stereophile speaker of the year - J. Phelan 10:12:00 11/17/17 (4)
- RE: Stereophile speaker of the year - John Atkinson 10:17:09 11/17/17 (3)
- RE: Stereophile speaker of the year - BubbaMike 11:03:55 11/17/17 (0)
- RE: Stereophile speaker of the year - J. Phelan 10:35:22 11/17/17 (1)
- RE: Stereophile speaker of the year - John Atkinson 07:03:39 11/19/17 (0)
- RE: Stereophile speaker of the year - John Atkinson 04:11:36 11/17/17 (7)
- Previous Winners Aren't Eligible - Inmate51 08:13:00 11/22/17 (6)
- RE: Previous Winners Aren't Eligible - John Atkinson 04:08:01 11/23/17 (3)
- RE: Previous Winners Aren't Eligible (stupidly long) - Charles Hansen 11:57:44 11/24/17 (2)
- RE: Previous Winners Aren't Eligible (stupidly long) - John Atkinson 12:57:23 11/24/17 (1)
- RE: Previous Winners Aren't Eligible (stupidly long) - Charles Hansen 16:43:26 11/24/17 (0)
- RE: Previous Winners Aren't Eligible - Charles Hansen 14:43:43 11/22/17 (1)
- RE: Previous Winners Aren't Eligible - FSonicSmith 15:41:23 11/22/17 (0)