In Reply to: RE: LOL! posted by Davey on November 10, 2017 at 10:48:47:
> > AA needs a "Critic's of the Critic's Corner"...where no "reviewers" are allowed to post. That might be fun. :) < <
I'm not so sure about that. Nobody from TAS has posted here in years (as far as I know, and excepting ex-TAS reviewers Mike Kuller (no longer reviewing AFAIK) and Sue Kraft (now at The Audio Beat after a fairly long hiatus AFAIK).
When I've criticized TAS here before, the most I received were legal threats. That wasn't very fun for me. You can try it yourself sometime if you like.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: LOL! - Charles Hansen 11/11/1704:42:51 11/11/17 (10)
- RE: LOL! - Davey 07:00:04 11/11/17 (9)
- RE: LOL! - bajawisconsin 14:43:25 11/17/17 (0)
- RE: "outright intellectual dishonesty" - Krav Maga 15:02:46 11/11/17 (2)
- RE: "outright intellectual dishonesty" - faskenite 15:07:38 11/11/17 (1)
- RE: "He probably is too Garvey!" - Krav Maga 15:36:09 11/11/17 (0)
- RE: LOL! Stereophile reviewers have been vetted with utmost scrutiny.. - stehno 12:54:05 11/11/17 (4)
- RE: LOL! Stereophile reviewers have been vetted with utmost scrutiny.. - John Atkinson 10:36:09 11/12/17 (2)
- I reread that section and I apologize - though I wasn't the only one who misread it. - stehno 11:14:38 11/12/17 (1)
- RE: I reread that section and I apologize - though I wasn't the only one who misread it. - John Atkinson 11:17:47 11/12/17 (0)
- RE: LOL! Stereophile reviewers have been vetted with utmost scrutiny.. - Davey 14:28:00 11/11/17 (0)