Home Critic's Corner

Discuss a review. Provide constructive feedback. Talk to the industry.

Those are your conclusions?

JA> > > In what I believe is /not/ an uninformed opinion, I think the vast majority of the criticisms made of MQA are not based on facts; are based on societal and financial factors that I don't regard as relevant; are commercially self-serving; are based on circular reasoning; or are nothing more than uninformed conspiracy theories.

Perhaps you're not including me in those who have criticized MQA, I have to admit that if that's what you've concluded, it's, well, nothing that's ever been on mind or the minds of most I've talked to. It also comes across as downright odd, if you ever wish to discuss...

There have been some who have mentioned things like the financial implications, but insofar as all the digital experts I've discussed this with, it's been the technical merit (or lack of) of MQA that's been first and foremost. Talk to Robert Watts, John Siau, etc. As for me, I've had trouble with the lack of proper listening experiments, which Bruno Putzeys brilliant brought to the forefront of the conversation last week. Those questions are much harder to duck.

Doug Schneider
SoundStage!




This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
  Sonic Craft  


Follow Ups Full Thread
Follow Ups

FAQ

Post a Message!

Forgot Password?
Moniker (Username):
Password (Optional):
  Remember my Moniker & Password  (What's this?)    Eat Me
E-Mail (Optional):
Subject:
Message:   (Posts are subject to Content Rules)
Optional Link URL:
Optional Link Title:
Optional Image URL:
Upload Image:
E-mail Replies:  Automagically notify you when someone responds.