In Reply to: Sadly, I believe TAS and Stereophile have sold out to MQA posted by 4everyoung on November 2, 2017 at 14:07:58:
There is, I think, a more benign explanation for all this. And it is based on an idea that, I would imagine, both Mr.Hansen and Stereophile share. That idea is the notion that things in audio land are always improving. There are exceptions, to be sure, but in the main, everything is getting better. Why else would people want to read about new stuff, much less buy it?
There's a long history that supports this: the rise of transistor powered electronics (no output transformers-yay; no tubes to burn out), CDs (no more flutter & wow; no more pops and clicks), SACD (no more "digititis") and so on. Each of these improvements was widely heralded when introduced (if memory serves, the sainted JGH was an early fan of CDs).
So, if Stereophile and other audio writers can be said to have a bias, I don't think it's because they are "bought and paid for," it's because they share — with the proponents of these new technologies— a desire to celebrate "the next big thing."
That they sometimes prove to be wrong is not, IMHOP, proof of their corruption; rather it is proof that, they, like the rest of us, carry with them a bag of hidden prejudices, assumptions, etc. of which they are mostly unaware.
Regarding the original topic of this thread, I agree with Mr. Hansen's criticism. Mr. Austin's review seemed hastily written and cries out for some editing. When I worked for a big metropolitan daily paper it was not uncommon for our stories to come back from the City Editor with a raft of handwritten questions that he wanted us to answer before he would send it along to be set in type. And why begin a review of a DAC with a rant about the high end's most sacred cow: insanely expensive wires? Mr. Austin may have a point, but does it belong in a review of a DAC?
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Keep your hands where I can see them while you take off that tinfoil hat! - Bruce from DC 11/3/1707:03:35 11/3/17 (65)
- Agree... - mkuller 08:36:13 11/3/17 (40)
- "discovered a revered product or company is not as good as people think" - DAP 11:54:40 11/6/17 (0)
- IMO, All these seem like unsubstantiated guesses. nt - stehno 17:36:07 11/3/17 (38)
- IMO, All these seem like unsubstantiated guesses. - mkuller 22:36:21 11/3/17 (37)
- RE: IMO, All these seem like unsubstantiated guesses. - stehno 13:15:38 11/4/17 (0)
- You never talked to me and I disagree with everything you said and - 4everyoung 07:52:09 11/4/17 (35)
- So please elaborate... - mkuller 10:17:23 11/4/17 (34)
- RE: So please elaborate... - 4everyoung 17:47:00 11/4/17 (33)
- RE: So please elaborate... - Charles Hansen 18:15:55 11/4/17 (32)
- Not trying, but succeeding ... - DAP 09:42:15 11/5/17 (10)
- RE: Not trying, but succeeding ... - Charles Hansen 20:09:11 11/5/17 (9)
- Let's have our hearing tested and see who wins that one - 4everyoung 23:40:10 11/5/17 (3)
- RE: Let's have our hearing tested and see who wins that one - Charles Hansen 08:04:33 11/6/17 (2)
- RE: Let's have our hearing tested and see who wins that one - 4everyoung 11:49:34 11/6/17 (0)
- RE: Website Archives - John Atkinson 10:55:23 11/6/17 (0)
- RE: Am I missing something? - Krav Maga 21:42:14 11/5/17 (2)
- RE: Am I missing something? - Charles Hansen 22:54:58 11/5/17 (1)
- Transhumanism is just as scary - Krav Maga 23:17:42 11/5/17 (0)
- ... don't care about finding the next big thing - DAP 21:08:23 11/5/17 (1)
- RE: ... don't care about finding the next big thing - Charles Hansen 22:23:40 11/5/17 (0)
- RE: So please elaborate... - 4everyoung 19:55:05 11/4/17 (20)
- RE: So please elaborate... - Charles Hansen 20:19:33 11/4/17 (19)
- Guilty of... - Krav Maga 23:20:22 11/4/17 (11)
- RE: Guilty of... - Charles Hansen 00:50:34 11/5/17 (10)
- RE: Guilty of... - Krav Maga 22:15:34 11/5/17 (1)
- Thanks for the link - Charles Hansen 02:01:24 11/6/17 (0)
- Also according to Wired ... - DAP 10:03:38 11/5/17 (6)
- RE: Also according to Wired ... - Krav Maga 14:19:24 11/5/17 (1)
- RE: Also according to Wired ... - regmac 13:14:48 11/6/17 (0)
- RE: Also according to Wired ... - Krav Maga 12:21:31 11/5/17 (3)
- The actual text ... - DAP 14:13:47 11/5/17 (2)
- Things that make you go hmmm - Krav Maga 14:44:17 11/5/17 (1)
- Wikipedia has a fairly good summary - DAP 15:29:50 11/5/17 (0)
- You mean "old men", surely ... - DAP 09:51:03 11/5/17 (0)
- Aargh. Stop digging. nt - Rick W 22:06:11 11/4/17 (6)
- RE: Aargh. Stop digging. nt - Charles Hansen 00:54:45 11/5/17 (5)
- You asked for it. - Rick W 09:16:44 11/5/17 (4)
- Thanks so much for your support - 4everyoung 23:50:39 11/5/17 (1)
- Keep on keepin' on. nt - Rick W 09:40:47 11/6/17 (0)
- Thanks very much! - Charles Hansen 21:13:47 11/5/17 (0)
- Totally agree (nt) - DAP 14:59:35 11/5/17 (0)
- RE: Keep your hands where I can see them while you take off that tinfoil hat! - regmac 07:28:39 11/3/17 (22)
- RE: Keep your hands where I can see them while you take off that tinfoil hat! - Charles Hansen 07:34:26 11/3/17 (21)
- Obviously you have a character flaw that prevents you from recognizing that JA is never wrong. - Rick W 12:27:29 11/4/17 (0)
- What might be a mistake to you could be a way of life for Atkinson, et al - stehno 17:57:17 11/3/17 (18)
- RE: What might be a mistake to you could be a way of life for Atkinson, et al - ornery 07:19:25 11/4/17 (9)
- RE: What might be a mistake to you could be a way of life for Atkinson, et al - John Atkinson 08:53:33 11/4/17 (8)
- RE: What might be a mistake to you could be a way of life for Atkinson, et al - Dale Clark 05:21:06 11/5/17 (0)
- RE: What might be a mistake to you could be a way of life for Atkinson, et al - ornery 17:59:58 11/4/17 (6)
- RE: What might be a mistake to you could be a way of life for Atkinson, et al - John Atkinson 04:18:28 11/5/17 (2)
- People quote the value and results of DBTs - E-Stat 13:02:30 11/6/17 (0)
- RE: What might be a mistake to you could be a way of life for Atkinson, et al - ornery 05:41:48 11/5/17 (0)
- RE: What might be a mistake to you could be a way of life for Atkinson, et al - Charles Hansen 18:35:21 11/4/17 (2)
- RE: What might be a mistake to you could be a way of life for Atkinson, et al - ornery 19:49:03 11/4/17 (1)
- RE: What might be a mistake to you could be a way of life for Atkinson, et al - Charles Hansen 20:12:35 11/4/17 (0)
- RE: What might be a mistake to you could be a way of life for Atkinson, et al - John Atkinson 04:43:09 11/4/17 (7)
- Speculating? Hardly. Here's my 3rd attempt to get your response to your listening experiences.... - stehno 15:22:23 11/4/17 (6)
- RE: Speculating? Hardly. Here's my 3rd attempt to get your response to your listening experiences.... - John Atkinson 15:46:53 11/4/17 (5)
- RE: Speculating? Hardly. Here's my 3rd attempt to get your response to your listening experiences.... - The Dill 17:22:45 11/4/17 (4)
- RE: Speculating? Hardly. Here's my 3rd attempt to get your response to your listening experiences.... - John Atkinson 04:26:39 11/5/17 (3)
- What in the world are you talking about? - stehno 12:03:41 11/6/17 (2)
- RE: What in the world are you talking about? - John Atkinson 16:54:07 11/6/17 (1)
- Dude, you obviously have no shame. nt - stehno 20:06:30 11/7/17 (0)
- RE: Keep your hands where I can see them while you take off that tinfoil hat! - standingstones 12:25:51 11/3/17 (0)
- Great post! +1 (nt) - Charles Hansen 07:05:47 11/3/17 (0)