In Reply to: RE: Funny I think I see just the opposite of you.... posted by stereo5 on October 30, 2017 at 12:02:52:
> > If he wanted to attack him like he did, Mr Hanson should have done it privately, not here. < <For nearly 2 full years I have been warning JA that MQA was a technical fraud - with zero effect. He would offer no substantive reply to any of my multiple critiques. I've begged him to speak with any of a half-dozen of the top digital designer and not promote this hoax, with no avail.
Then the more I studied it and the more I found out about it, the more blatant technical lies I found. Finally Linn and others wrote pieces about the negative political aspects of MQA. I began to find out more of the history of Meridian and Bob Stuart - and it is not pretty.
I made contacts in the record and streaming industries to find out the implications and ramifications of MQA and was extremely disturbed by the DRM and the potential for grievous misuse.
I contacted mastering engineers and recording studios and found near-unanimous resistance and outright hostility of MQA. No matter how much of this information I passed on the JA, Stereophile continued to act as if MQA was the greatest invention since the vacuum tube, with constant reporting and implications that it was "THE FUTURE" of audio and products that didn't offer it should be avoided.
Since I have brought this public, they have finally backed off. Look at their coverage of the RMAF. An internet search shows it mention 3 times. It appears that (much as I wish it didn't) a public expos
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Funny I think I see just the opposite of you.... - Charles Hansen 10/30/1712:24:46 10/30/17 (23)
- I think you are angry about something you have no control over. CHILL! - pffft? 15:06:13 10/30/17 (18)
- Perhaps right, definitely partially wrong. - Charles Hansen 19:19:40 10/30/17 (17)
- RE: Perhaps right, definitely partially wrong. - Dale Clark 19:28:33 10/30/17 (16)
- RE: Perhaps right, definitely partially wrong. - Charles Hansen 19:42:23 10/30/17 (15)
- RE: Perhaps right, definitely partially wrong. - ahendler 22:22:01 10/30/17 (14)
- RE: Perhaps right, definitely partially wrong. - dbphd 23:29:10 10/30/17 (12)
- RE: Perhaps right, definitely partially wrong. - Charles Hansen 00:40:40 10/31/17 (11)
- RE: Perhaps right, definitely partially wrong. - stereo5 11:26:23 10/31/17 (1)
- RE: Perhaps right, definitely partially wrong. - Charles Hansen 21:16:11 10/31/17 (0)
- RE: Perhaps right, definitely partially wrong. - kentaja 06:37:01 10/31/17 (6)
- Thanks for the correction - Charles Hansen 10:23:34 10/31/17 (4)
- RE: Thanks for the correction - kentaja 10:43:14 10/31/17 (3)
- RE: Thanks for the correction - Charles Hansen 11:07:53 10/31/17 (2)
- Sauce for the Grouse . . . - goldenthal 02:19:37 11/14/17 (0)
- RE: Thanks for the correction - kentaja 11:17:50 10/31/17 (0)
- RE: Perhaps right, definitely partially wrong. - kentaja 09:58:37 10/31/17 (0)
- RE: Perhaps right, definitely partially wrong. - Dale Clark 03:34:24 10/31/17 (1)
- RE: Perhaps right, definitely partially wrong. - Charles Hansen 10:52:05 10/31/17 (0)
- Huh? - Charles Hansen 22:44:37 10/30/17 (0)
- If only we could follow the money... - stehno 13:39:31 10/30/17 (3)
- RE: If only we could follow the money... - ahendler 22:25:04 10/30/17 (1)
- RE: If only we could follow the money... - Charles Hansen 22:53:34 10/30/17 (0)
- Careful you two, as much as I appreciate your efforts, you guys are skating close to the edge. Both... - regmac 14:09:34 10/30/17 (0)