Home Critic's Corner

Discuss a review. Provide constructive feedback. Talk to the industry.

RE: This kind of says it all with MQA

It seems to me if the technology was worth jack squat someone making lots of money on it would be able to come to an event and demonstrate and explain why MQA is superior - and it SHOULD be able to withstand scrutiny.

Listening tests describing a technological improvement can't be an improvement solely relying on superior masters. This is glorified compression decompression system - if you want a better master buy a better master. And there are many masters of the same albums as I mentioned below.

Now even if Mark Waldrep is a well known basher of this technology so what? No skeptics allowed at the table?

It is pretty evident that the MQA shills don't want people to walk away from a debate finding out the emperor has no clothes.

I mean not showing up to defend the supposedly superior sound sure adds to the skepticism.

Mark notes "It seems MQA is fine with one-sided presentations and photo ops .../... Apparently, some in their camp don't believe that their message can survive critical analysis and open debate."





This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
  Parts Connexion  


Follow Ups Full Thread
Follow Ups

FAQ

Post a Message!

Forgot Password?
Moniker (Username):
Password (Optional):
  Remember my Moniker & Password  (What's this?)    Eat Me
E-Mail (Optional):
Subject:
Message:   (Posts are subject to Content Rules)
Optional Link URL:
Optional Link Title:
Optional Image URL:
Upload Image:
E-mail Replies:  Automagically notify you when someone responds.