|
Critic's Corner Discuss a review. Provide constructive feedback. Talk to the industry. |
|
|
|
Critic's Corner Discuss a review. Provide constructive feedback. Talk to the industry. |
|
In Reply to: RE: How is that link evidence for pay for play? n.t. posted by 4everyoung on September 10, 2017 at 10:17:42:
> > Just don't get your expectations too high as far as MQA is concerned < <
Why not? Haven't you seen the latest TAS? MQA is featured at nearly every turn, including Harley's 10,000 word essay invoking Kuhn's book "The Structure Of Scientific Revolution" as a framework. In it he claims that MQA is a paradigm shift that makes all previous digital audio obsolete:
"MQA is in the crosshairs of Kuhn's "battle" between those who cling to the old paradigm, and others who embrace the new. Early PCM audio (and DSD) will one day be regarded as primitive relics of the past, the product of first paradigm thinking in audio ngineering, theory, and pyscho-acoustics."
Don't you want to try out the $200 on the Explorer2 from Amazon? Amazon has a 30-day return policy, to go along with your 30-day free trial from Tidal. How could you possibly go wrong? You are going to experience "far better sound quality than that of any previous analog or digital technology".
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: How is that link evidence for pay for play? n.t. - Charles Hansen 09/10/1710:59:15 09/10/17 (2)
- RE: How is that link evidence for pay for play? n.t. - 4everyoung 18:06:58 09/10/17 (1)
- RE: How is that link evidence for pay for play? n.t. - Charles Hansen 00:18:20 09/11/17 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2025, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
