In Reply to: RE: How is that link evidence for pay for play? n.t. posted by Charles Hansen on September 7, 2017 at 21:30:24:
> > From the way that RH writes about it, one wouldn't think a valid comparison would be necessary, would it? From his written descriptions, it seems to me that it would just be obvious - "far better sound quality than that of any previous analog or digital technology". < <
So tell me, how do I hear that same level of improvement in my own system? Be the shill editor of a hifi magazine? And I don't say that lightly as I used to have a lot of respect for Robert Harley.
Now it's time to get back to real life.
Sue
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: How is that link evidence for pay for play? n.t. - 4everyoung 09/8/1712:13:52 09/8/17 (5)
- RE: How is that link evidence for pay for play? n.t. - Charles Hansen 00:40:14 09/10/17 (4)
- RE: How is that link evidence for pay for play? n.t. - 4everyoung 10:17:42 09/10/17 (3)
- RE: How is that link evidence for pay for play? n.t. - Charles Hansen 10:59:15 09/10/17 (2)
- RE: How is that link evidence for pay for play? n.t. - 4everyoung 18:06:58 09/10/17 (1)
- RE: How is that link evidence for pay for play? n.t. - Charles Hansen 00:18:20 09/11/17 (0)