In Reply to: RE: How is that link evidence for pay for play? n.t. posted by 4everyoung on August 31, 2017 at 16:03:13:
> > Where does one hear a valid comparison? Robert's house? < <
From the way that RH writes about it, one wouldn't think a valid comparison would be necessary, would it? From his written descriptions, it seems to me that it would just be obvious - "far better sound quality than that of any previous analog or digital technology".
Of course it would only make sense to want to hear a valid comparison. Unfortunately as far as I can tell, MQA has gone out of their way to make sure than any comparisons are *not* valid - and apparently especially so for what MQA terms "key opinion makers" in their business plan. See link below for details:
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: How is that link evidence for pay for play? n.t. - Charles Hansen 09/7/1721:30:24 09/7/17 (6)
- RE: How is that link evidence for pay for play? n.t. - 4everyoung 12:13:52 09/8/17 (5)
- RE: How is that link evidence for pay for play? n.t. - Charles Hansen 00:40:14 09/10/17 (4)
- RE: How is that link evidence for pay for play? n.t. - 4everyoung 10:17:42 09/10/17 (3)
- RE: How is that link evidence for pay for play? n.t. - Charles Hansen 10:59:15 09/10/17 (2)
- RE: How is that link evidence for pay for play? n.t. - 4everyoung 18:06:58 09/10/17 (1)
- RE: How is that link evidence for pay for play? n.t. - Charles Hansen 00:18:20 09/11/17 (0)