|
Critic's Corner Discuss a review. Provide constructive feedback. Talk to the industry. |
|
|
|
Critic's Corner Discuss a review. Provide constructive feedback. Talk to the industry. |
|
In Reply to: RE: Thanks to the excellence of the AA search box ... posted by Charles Hansen on August 30, 2017 at 21:34:10:
The one I responded to referred to TAS generally as "corrupt thieves." You only gave context when you were pressed in follow ups.
> > You are correct that I don't have video recordings or signed
> > confessions. But if you can't add 2 + 2
I have to say, when you talk about TAS, you generally skip the first "2" and the second "2", and jump directly to the sum. You've published a fair number of posts that simply go, TAS is corrupt. stop.
I'm surprised that the moderators allow this. Wait a moment, I'm not surprised that the moderators allow this. They always have.
Daniel
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- There was no such distinction in your original posts, then or now - DAP 08/31/1707:54:18 08/31/17 (2)
- DAP = Apologist? - SpotcheckBilly12345 08:16:40 08/31/17 (1)
- It's easy enough to check - DAP 08:51:15 08/31/17 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2025, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
