|
Critic's Corner Discuss a review. Provide constructive feedback. Talk to the industry. |
|
|
|
Critic's Corner Discuss a review. Provide constructive feedback. Talk to the industry. |
|
In Reply to: RE: How is that link evidence for pay for play? n.t. posted by BubbaMike on August 30, 2017 at 14:25:58:
I located this question that I posed to Charles Hansen in response to a similar post:"You can't seriously be suggesting that writers like Alan Taffel, Neil Gader, Steven Stone, Peter Breuninger et al are corrupt thieves??? I don't believe that of Robert Harley either."
He replied:
"I don't have anything against any of the writers you named. As far as I know they are all honest men."
See RE: Just a suggestion for the rest of his response.
I think Charles Hansen paints with too wide a brush. Because of his position in the industry, there is a presumption that when he makes a statement about a magazine being corrupt, it's based on inside and reliable information. But when he's pressed, there doesn't seem to be much there, other than conjecture, and old news.
Daniel
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Thanks to the excellence of the AA search box ... - DAP 08/30/1715:05:19 08/30/17 (4)
- RE: Thanks to the excellence of the AA search box ... - Charles Hansen 21:34:10 08/30/17 (3)
- There was no such distinction in your original posts, then or now - DAP 07:54:18 08/31/17 (2)
- DAP = Apologist? - SpotcheckBilly12345 08:16:40 08/31/17 (1)
- It's easy enough to check - DAP 08:51:15 08/31/17 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2025, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]