In Reply to: You read rhetorically, my statement was literal. posted by Pat D on April 27, 2006 at 04:41:12:
Answer: Of course not!What's obvious is that many of the items JA mentions would be considered subtle changes by many an audiophile. For example the orientation of a cables' connected (at only one end) shield, i.e. if the connected shield is grounded at the source vs. destination side. Personally I would have thought that even in the general case such would be difficult to detect even in a non-controlled blind conditions setting.
But this only shows that blind tests *can* be utilized to detect such differences. That doesn't touch upon the issue of how practical such tests are, nor whether they have much interest to audiophiles in general.
Both topics have been discussed extensively here and hence there is no need to repeat. To do, in your case, would be an exercise in futility par excellence, specifically because you have demonstrated again and again that you are perfectly opaque to argument and even facts.
It seems to me that the objectivist method in cases such as JA's testimonial is to discredit the claims, witness the Jon Risch case. This is because the *only* results worth consideration are those that fit their narrative. The rest is a complete waste of time, no less so that attempting to reason with any type of fundamentalist zealot.
Hmmmm ...? Reflecting upon which I'm afraid I have to admit to no small embarrassment, but perhaps with effort I might prove not to be a lost cause, thus ... Goodbye Pat.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- One the question will you "... have the decency to STFU and accept your own statement?" - bjh 04/27/0608:20:10 04/27/06 (32)
- I can't help it if you misread what's there. - Pat D 10:17:03 04/27/06 (31)
- So what is a "neutral" interconnect - E-Stat 16:00:46 04/27/06 (30)
- Re: So what is a "neutral" interconnect - Pat D 17:18:21 04/27/06 (29)
- Here's what you said - E-Stat 17:44:03 04/27/06 (28)
- Re: Here's what you said - Pat D 17:50:54 04/27/06 (27)
- Let's see if you can answer these simple questions - E-Stat 18:07:52 04/27/06 (26)
- So, in fact, nothing in my statement was unclear and you want to shift the discussion. - Pat D 06:02:08 04/28/06 (8)
- Fine - E-Stat 07:34:53 04/28/06 (7)
- Provide some evidence. - Pat D 14:16:02 04/28/06 (6)
- Evidence to what? - E-Stat 14:21:35 04/28/06 (5)
- Re: Evidence to what? - Pat D 14:23:59 04/28/06 (4)
- Is this a fair conclusion? - E-Stat 14:37:38 04/28/06 (3)
- Not really. - Pat D 18:24:27 04/28/06 (2)
- Everything sounds the same. Got it (nt) - E-Stat 18:51:59 04/28/06 (1)
- Where do you get such silliness? (nt) - Pat D 19:10:31 04/28/06 (0)
- E-Stat, you need to read Pat's tag line - Bruce from DC 05:52:28 04/28/06 (16)
- Reminds me of the ever evasive Silver Eared John (nt) - E-Stat 13:33:22 04/28/06 (0)
- Re: E-Stat, you need to read Pat's tag line - bjh 07:31:44 04/28/06 (0)
- Re: E-Stat, you need to read Pat's tag line - regmac 07:03:45 04/28/06 (1)
- to paraphrase our former President: - Bruce from DC 07:43:59 04/28/06 (0)
- Oh no, he's just trying to trip me up. - Pat D 06:16:57 04/28/06 (11)
- Re: "'being silly" - Bruce from DC 08:30:21 04/28/06 (1)
- Re: "'being silly" - Pat D 14:18:58 04/28/06 (0)
- Or, choice B - E-Stat 07:54:51 04/28/06 (8)
- Apparently you missed the most important lecture during ... - bjh 08:03:17 04/28/06 (7)
- Where did I assert my interconnects are neutral? - Pat D 14:21:58 04/28/06 (6)
- Ah ha --- so your interconnects are NOT neutral? - Richard BassNut Greene 07:09:06 05/3/06 (5)
- My dear Nut... - kerr 07:26:28 05/3/06 (4)
- k. d. lang has one of the best female voices in pop music -- although may sound like "Tiny Tim on YOUR system - Richard BassNut Greene 07:50:29 05/3/06 (3)
- She does - kerr 08:02:17 05/3/06 (2)
- That was a very amusing post -- your ghostwriter is ? - Richard BassNut Greene 08:38:53 05/3/06 (1)
- You of all people should be able to answer that! - kerr 08:53:54 05/3/06 (0)