Home Critic's Corner

Discuss a review. Provide constructive feedback. Talk to the industry.

Already read it.

Just what is it that you think that I think is impossible?

You will notice that JA achieved positive results in some DBTs, which totally refutes Mr. Kuller's maunderings on that matter, as if it needed further refutation. JA has too much sense to reject DBT methodology, as such, and in fact, a careful reader may notice he uses some things established through the use of DBTs in his reviews.

I do notice that in his list, he described his results in some cases in terms of equipment or parts used rather than what was actually in the signals, so as to establish a correlation with measured results. However, I imagine he probably has that information.

And, dear bjh: jj is a Fellow of the AES and a Fellow and Senior Member of the IEEE. Gee, they seem to think he knows something!

BTW, are you now prepared to admit that poor subjects for DBTs can be determined by DBTs?
____________________________________________________________
"Nature loves to hide."
---Heraclitus of Ephesus (trans. Wheelwright)



This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
  VH Audio  


Follow Ups Full Thread
Follow Ups


You can not post to an archived thread.