In Reply to: Stereophile tells readers and manufacturers what they want to hear posted by Richard BassNut Greene on April 24, 2006 at 08:52:10:
All components sound different and real audiophiles can hear those differences.(That's the 100% absolute truth!)
====================================================================
There's no reason to prove this because proof is not demanded.(Why do I or anyone else for that matter, have to prove anything to you or anyone else? I'm/we're in this hobby for my/our enjoyment only. What you believe or say plays no part in that experience)
====================================================================
The reviewers can say whatever they feel like saying about a component -- there's no need to prove they can really hear a difference at all because those with money (the readers, advertisers, and potential advertisers) believe the myth and will attack or ignore any contrary data. That's how beliefs are kept alive.(It's true that the reviewers can say whatever they feel like saying about a component. However, if what they say isn't also experienced by the many people who read their magazines and then hear the component reviewed, said reviewer WILL BE called to the carpet for their remarks and usually quite harshly, here in AA and in their letters section. We often see that exact thing happen, where the reviewer is challenged to explain how they came to their conclusions! The ONLY myth here is your belief that this isn't true!)
====================================================================
For speaker reviews the brand/model differences are easily audible, but this is very unlikely to apply to electronics and wires where objective audiophiles in the past three decades have rarely been able to hear the alleged differences that are so easily "heard" in subjective auditions ... that "even the wife could hear them".(I honestly don't know why objective audiophiles cannot hear differences that are easily audible to subjective audiophiles! Perhaps the real reason is objective audiophiles believe so deeply that differeneces do not exist, that these beliefs prevent them from hearing them? (Kind of like when the objectivist claims that because subjectivist see a brand name we hear a difference in reverse.) Perhaps they have poor equipment? Perhaps their poor hearing is what makes them an objective audiophile in the first place? IE they cannot hear a difference so THAT proves no difference exists?)
====================================================================
The result of participating in a blind audition is a better understanding of how easily differences among audio components can be heard while listening to music.(Says you...for me to believe that you'll have prove it!)
====================================================================
The result is not likely to be pleasant -- actual hearing ability tends to be a lot worse than participants believed before the experiment.(Says you...again I say you'll have to prove it!)
====================================================================
Participants do not walk away claiming the experiment was faulty -- only non-participants make that claim!(From what I'm now reading it appears that you, Richard BassNut Greene feel you can say whatever you feel like saying about a DBTs --yet there's no need for you to prove it's true. If you want me to believe that statement PROVE IT!)
====================================================================
The best way to avoid this unpleasant reality is to attack all audiophiles who participate in objective listening experiments and never participate in one yourself.(Oh Richard in my experience it's the objective audiophiles who create this unpleasant reality you speak of. They do it by insisting that subjective audiophiles participate in the objectivist imposed objective listening experiments. IMHO subjective audiophiles feel why do we have to prove anything to you or anyone else? I'll repeat-- I'm/we're in this hobby for my/our enjoyment only. What you believe or say plays no part in that experience. Why can you not leave us in peace? Believe what you want and we'll believe what we want.)
====================================================================
It's easy to believe you have superior hearing (or any other ability) ... if you never have to prove it.(Who are you or any other subjective audiophile that objectivist audiophiles have to prove anything to you? You don't believe what we say? So Be It! I for one don't care if you believe I hear differences or not. I'm sure most other objective audiophiles feel the same way. I know it doesn't bother me that when you claim the differences subjective audiophiles hear aren't real, so why does it bother you so much that subjective audiophiles claim they can hear them? Again I'll say Richard in my experience it's the objective audiophiles (like you) who create this unpleasant atmosphere by refusing to leave subjectivists to believe what they do.)
====================================================================
So say only good things about audio, never challenge the 'everything sounds different myth' by doing experiments, and always attack the motives or methodology of EVERYONE who does such "evil" experiments.(First IMHO I don't believe subjective audiophiles say only good things about audio. Second subjective audiophiles don't always attack the motives or methodology of EVERYONE who does such "evil" experiments. Instead subjective audiophiles typically are defending themselves when attacked by people like you! Who demand we prove our claims of hearing differences in components.
But I ask you what vested interest do I have in hearing differences? I'm disabled and until recently lived on a fixed income EVERY audio purchase I made required months and sometimes years of saving. I wished someone made a $500 solidstate integrated amp that sounded like my Mastersound Reference 845, or $50 interconnects that sound like my Z-Squared Au/Au's etc. Unfortuantely no one does and I hear the differences in these components. So I save and buy the ones that sound the most realistic to me. If there's anything "evil" here it's people like you who constantly create turmoil by demanding of them proof of their claims. Why not just let them enjoy their hobby? I'll repeat myself again "Why do you care if I hear differences in audio components? I certainly don't care that you cannot!)
====================================================================
Most audiophiles are perfectly happy with their audio myths.
Why let audio reality get in the way of happiness?(The truth is most audiphiles are happy with their audio beliefs (not myths)whether they're objectivists or subjectvists. It isn't reality that gets in the way of our happiness. It's people like you who refuse to allow others to believe differently than you! Rather than adopt a live and let live attitude, you constantly attack those who don't agree with your belief system. I now challenge you to prove to me that you cannot hear differences in audio components! Just saying it won't suffice, prove it beyond a reasonable doubt. For all I know you can hear differences, but just say you cannot. So prove to me that you cannot.)
====================================================================
Anything objective audiophiles say is attacked: Bad ears. Bad stereo.
Bad methodology. Participants were too pressured. The dog ate the paper.(Once again how wrong you are. Subjectivists are usually defending themselves from people like Richard BassNut Greene who attack them because their beliefs aren't his beiefs. That's the real evil here. You claim you don't hear differences, I claim I do and I'll be happy to prove it to you. Come to Orlando, Fla. and we'll use my system which I'm intimately familiar with. I will tell you EVERYTIME time you change any one component in the system. Whether it's the integrated amp, CD player, speakers, or wires. So now I've accepted your challenge---now what's your excuse why we don't do this?)
Thetubeguy1954
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- The Real Truth (IMHO) - thetubeguy1954 04/26/0607:13:46 04/26/06 (43)
- High end audio = a field where people can claim to have exceptional skills and never have to prove it ! That's rare. - Richard BassNut Greene 09:07:57 04/26/06 (41)
- Automotive engineering - E-Stat 14:49:07 04/27/06 (5)
- Re: Automotive engineering - Soundmind 06:13:26 04/28/06 (2)
- You missed my point - E-Stat 07:32:54 04/28/06 (1)
- Re: You missed my point - Ozzie 09:38:58 04/29/06 (0)
- actually, the difference is . . . - Bruce from DC 05:54:11 04/28/06 (1)
- LOL! (nt) - E-Stat 07:35:29 04/28/06 (0)
- Wine tasters, food critics, film reviewers, etc...(nt) - mkuller 11:41:46 04/27/06 (0)
- Re: High end audio = a field where people can claim to have exceptional skills and never have to prove it ! That's rar - John Atkinson 14:41:21 04/26/06 (27)
- If that was the best proof you have that all components sound different to you ... then I feel sorry for you - Richard BassNut Greene 09:12:08 05/1/06 (0)
- It took you over 100 blind tests to come to the conclusion that blind tests are a waste of time? - Richard BassNut Greene 08:02:47 04/28/06 (21)
- Ouch! - Ozzie 09:42:56 04/29/06 (0)
- Please answer the question, Mr. Greene - John Atkinson 07:19:57 04/29/06 (13)
- I answered your question in my May 1 post & answered every other question you asked in this post - Richard BassNut Greene 09:16:49 05/2/06 (4)
- Patience, please, Mr Greene - John Atkinson 16:51:32 05/2/06 (3)
- Waiting for YOUR answers to MY questions does require patience --- Infinite Patience is required (you don't respond) - Richard BassNut Greene 07:54:30 05/3/06 (2)
- Why infinite? - John Atkinson 09:14:11 05/3/06 (1)
- I swear I did not ghostwrite the JA post as a perfect example of what "non-answer" means! - Richard BassNut Greene 08:54:02 05/5/06 (0)
- reference - Ozzie 09:46:03 04/29/06 (7)
- Even evidence disappears in the face of disbelieve. - bjh 14:54:18 04/29/06 (1)
- Obviously you care. - Ozzie 15:47:00 05/1/06 (0)
- More uncritical thinking - John Atkinson 11:17:11 04/29/06 (4)
- I am not a magazine writer... - Ozzie 16:19:00 05/1/06 (3)
- We're all plowing the same furrow, Ozzie - John Atkinson 16:41:39 05/2/06 (2)
- JA now says Stereophile reviewers do not have superior hearing ("Neither do we claim we have superior hearing, Ozzie") - Richard BassNut Greene 08:59:14 05/3/06 (1)
- BassNut - Ozzie 13:37:45 05/3/06 (0)
- If you want to know which tests were well designed, surely the ones with the null result were well done - Soundmind 10:36:52 04/28/06 (2)
- Why take tests when you can claim exceptional hearing ability & your readers and advertisers will never ask for proof ? - Richard BassNut Greene 13:45:44 04/28/06 (1)
- You have to take the "sucker factor" into account - Soundmind 14:06:20 04/28/06 (0)
- Re: It took you over 100 blind tests to come to the conclusion that blind tests are a waste of time? - John Atkinson 08:47:36 04/28/06 (2)
- Where are the "null results" for sighted auditions? Why do all components sound different ONLY when brands are known? - Richard BassNut Greene 08:16:10 05/3/06 (0)
- We are all very fortunate.... - Soundmind 14:26:56 04/28/06 (0)
- Re: High end audio = a field where people can claim to have exceptional skills and never have to prove it ! That's rar - Soundmind 05:41:55 04/28/06 (0)
- Re: High end audio = a field where people can claim to have exceptional skills and never have to prove it ! That's rar - Ozzie 19:37:09 04/27/06 (2)
- Please do the work and get back to me - John Atkinson 08:59:46 04/28/06 (0)
- As far as "a" goes . . . - markrohr 04:34:45 04/28/06 (0)
- Your DBT Challenge Was Accepted, So Put Up Or Shut Up! - thetubeguy1954 12:10:45 04/26/06 (4)
- Short term memory is the first to go . . . - Pat D 13:24:19 04/26/06 (3)
- No... Meds Affected My Posts - thetubeguy1954 10:36:50 04/27/06 (2)
- Re: No... Meds Affected My Posts - Pat D 17:32:43 04/27/06 (1)
- Re: No... Meds Affected My Posts - thetubeguy1954 10:16:08 04/28/06 (0)
- Not rare, virtually unique. I can't think of any other field of endeavor short of the occult where this occurs nt - Soundmind 09:38:23 04/26/06 (0)
- Excellent! Very well stated (nt) - kerr 07:53:42 04/26/06 (0)