In Reply to: Duster's attack was manifestly objectionable, the worst I've seen on the CA ... and no warning! Truly disturbing! nt posted by bjh on February 21, 2006 at 09:19:45:
Until Mike B. apologizes to myself and others for his "manifestly objectionable" flames, I will only apologize to the forum.I do apologize to CA for the flame I posted. Ted reminded via email me to back down and stay proper. However, ye doth protest too much in this case, bjh.
You are not one to speak of other's attacks, since you once posted one of the most biting, hostile, ridicule filled, and unfounded attacks I've ever seen against me in CA, and without any apology when I protested. I'm glad it was deleted by the moderators.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- pot calling kettle black - Duster 02/21/0613:20:05 02/21/06 (1)
- "I do apologize to CA for the flame I posted." As you certainly should, good man! nt - bjh 15:02:11 02/21/06 (1)