In Reply to: HUUUUUMMMMMMM! posted by Jon Risch on November 22, 2004 at 16:13:03:
JR: ""I can not publically relate what was threatened in a private e-mail""Indeed...a very respectable statement...one I concur with, even the ones you sent me...will remain private..
Ulas, of course, can verify that he threatened you??
JR: ""but the public record speaks for itself. ""
What I've seen is you attacking him repeatedly in the public record..you consistently start it by attacking the person..
JR: ""Ulas's is not a "normal" review, it certainly seems to have elements of personal animosity involved""
It's impossible to tell.. It is, however, clear that you, in all cases, (historically speaking, of course) always divert the discussion away from actual facts, to one of denigrating the person and their motives. So, no, it doesn't appear to be Ulas' animosity here, but rather, yours.
JR: ""Just as there is a good possibility that your post here and now was motiviated by something other than the concerns you seem to be voicing.""
See? exactly what I stated..you try to re-direct anything you don't like, to an attack on the person..
JR: ""That is the sad part, enough folks get confused, and start believing the propoganda""
Propaganda??? Is it propaganda to point out your uncivil behaviour as seen in your postings?? Is it propaganda to speak of how you divert the discussion from the issue to attacking the person??? You even do it in this post...it's there, Jon...it's not propaganda..all I did was point my finger at your behaviour...your public behaviour..
Enjoy the technical solitude...
Cheers, John
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- looks like ya got a ground loop there.. - jneutron 11/23/0407:55:29 11/23/04 (0)