![]() |
Amp/Preamp Asylum Looking for a new Amp or Preamp? If you're after tubes, post over here. |
|
In Reply to: Re: Three times I have tried passive units. They each lasted less than a month. posted by morricab on April 11, 2006 at 01:33:58:
< < I hooked this [my phono stage] up commando (ie. no line stage and no volume control) > >This is not a fair experiment to run, so it is not surprising that you reached a conclusion that contradicts my experiences.
As manufacturers, we are in a better position to run experiments with all of the variables controlled. For what it's worth, the output stage and power supplies in our CD players are essentially identical to those in our preamplifiers. So your conclusion that a passive preamp would work if the CD player were designed differently is not correct, in my experience.
I'm sticking with what I wrote in my earlier post. So, for example, if you only have $1000 to spend on a preamp, a passive will yield better overall results than an active. Indeed, a $1000 passive will yield better overall results than some mediocre $10,000 active preamps (of which there are more than there should be). However, a really top-notch $10,000 active will sound significantly better than any passive, regardless of how the output stage of the source is designed.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Apples and oranges - Charles Hansen 04/11/0610:09:39 04/11/06 (11)
- Re: Apples and oranges - morricab 02:40:59 04/12/06 (10)
- Re: Apples and oranges - Charles Hansen 07:41:18 04/12/06 (9)
- Re: Apples and oranges - morricab 01:50:20 04/13/06 (8)
- Re: Apples and oranges - Charles Hansen 08:31:45 04/13/06 (7)
- Re: Apples and oranges - morricab 13:34:28 04/14/06 (6)
- Re: Apples and oranges - Charles Hansen 14:35:34 04/14/06 (5)
- Re: Apples and oranges - proth 16:16:28 04/14/06 (4)
- Re: Apples and oranges - Charles Hansen 19:12:52 04/14/06 (3)
- PreAmp Feature Set + - proth 11:03:26 04/15/06 (2)
- Re: PreAmp Feature Set + - Charles Hansen 14:57:46 04/15/06 (1)
- Thanks for taking suggestions under consideration (nt) - proth 15:51:48 04/16/06 (0)