![]() |
Amp/Preamp Asylum Looking for a new Amp or Preamp? If you're after tubes, post over here. |
|
In Reply to: RE: Since you still have a burr under your saddle posted by Ralph on March 3, 2025 at 10:28:52:
It means you have offered nothing and then acted offended when challenged...you can say that is name calling but it is a fact.
"You have not provided any evidence that this is in fact true. I cannot explain something that has not be demonstrated to exist.
I did ask what sort of evidence would be acceptable but you didn't respond."
Not true. I told you that the residual distortion wave form would be proof. You didn't provide that for either the Topping or the old EV amp.
"This sure looks like backpedaling to me... I explained how its able to have no zero crossing artifact. Clearly you're not reading."
No, clearly we were discussing transistor amps in the thread and then you chose to throw something else into the mix.
"Robert Heinlein once said "Ignorance is curable, stupid is forever.""
Project much?? You're the one who misinterpreted what the thread was discussing and decided to throw some old tube amp into the mix. I read your posts but didn't google the exact amp until recently. You still didn't provide any technical proof that it doesn't suffer from crossover distortion. WHat few measurements I found would not tell you this.
So, it is you who are dodging the requests for data to demonstrate.
Did you miss the point that the Topping is a solid state amp?
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Since you still have a burr under your saddle - morricab 03/4/2500:15:22 03/4/25 (7)
- You are objuscating. - Ralph 09:12:51 03/4/25 (6)
- RE: You are objuscating. - morricab 01:41:27 03/5/25 (5)
- Apparently you're not interested in the truth. - Ralph 10:16:31 03/5/25 (4)
- RE: Apparently you're not interested in the truth. - morricab 11:52:33 03/7/25 (3)
- Again, for the 5th time now, what will you consider to be data? - Ralph 10:07:08 03/10/25 (2)
- RE: Again, for the 5th time now, what will you consider to be data? - morricab 10:51:49 03/10/25 (1)
- Data posted at link. - Ralph 10:58:02 03/10/25 (0)