![]() |
Amp/Preamp Asylum Looking for a new Amp or Preamp? If you're after tubes, post over here. |
|
In Reply to: RE: Since you still have a burr under your saddle posted by morricab on March 3, 2025 at 01:18:31:
It's sad that you think a professional challenge is abusive. Stop being a snowflake Ralph and man up.
Name calling like this is abusive and earlier you used the word 'amateurish'. What is sad is that you have to resort to this sort of tactic. It literally means you have nothing.
I explained how a solid state class B amp can be designed to have no zero crossing artifact. My assumption is you didn't read that post or have chosen to ignore it.
You have not provided any evidence that this is in fact true. I cannot explain something that has not be demonstrated to exist.
I did ask what sort of evidence would be acceptable but you didn't respond.
Furthermore, the EV A-20C is a tube amp, not a transistor amp. Tubes behave differently around cutoff than transistors, which get really non-linear. It could be that a tube amp in Class B is not as troubled by zero crossing distortion as a transistor amp clearly is. Therefore, it is unfair to use that as an example when discussing transistor amps.
This sure looks like backpedaling to me... I explained how its able to have no zero crossing artifact. Clearly you're not reading.
Robert Heinlein once said "Ignorance is curable, stupid is forever."
If one refuses to read, and therefore chooses to remain ignorant, how is that not stupid??
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Since you still have a burr under your saddle - Ralph 03/3/2510:28:52 03/3/25 (8)
- RE: Since you still have a burr under your saddle - morricab 00:15:22 03/4/25 (7)
- You are objuscating. - Ralph 09:12:51 03/4/25 (6)
- RE: You are objuscating. - morricab 01:41:27 03/5/25 (5)
- Apparently you're not interested in the truth. - Ralph 10:16:31 03/5/25 (4)
- RE: Apparently you're not interested in the truth. - morricab 11:52:33 03/7/25 (3)
- Again, for the 5th time now, what will you consider to be data? - Ralph 10:07:08 03/10/25 (2)
- RE: Again, for the 5th time now, what will you consider to be data? - morricab 10:51:49 03/10/25 (1)
- Data posted at link. - Ralph 10:58:02 03/10/25 (0)