thanks for your clarification - theaudiohobby

Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - So, you are telling me that Panny, Sony, etc. (digital amps) are better than Rowland, Pass, ML, etc.? - Gateway 15:30:34 08/21/04 (56)

Listen and believe - wineau 17:57:07 08/26/04 (0)

I definitely prefer my Bel Canto to my Panny - Feanor 16:49:46 08/23/04 (0)

Re: So, you are telling me that Panny, Sony, etc. (digital amps) are better than Rowland, Pass, ML, etc.? - NEAR SOTA 03:46:16 08/23/04 (0)

No but for 700 bucks the flying mole is something to hear - kbuzz 18:52:46 08/22/04 (1)

RE: Another Vote for digitals... - Passive Chappy 12:29:16 08/23/04 (0)

Will Be Trying Teac Digital Amp - Todd Krieger 14:56:26 08/22/04 (1)

Re: Will Be Trying Teac Digital Amp - rayler 13:24:58 08/23/04 (0)

Re: So, you are telling me that Panny, Sony, etc. (digital amps) are better than Rowland, Pass, ML, etc.? - AlphaGeek 12:56:43 08/22/04 (0)

I don't think anyone is saying that. - Jack G 08:23:43 08/22/04 (12)

I'm saying it - muralman1 19:37:08 08/22/04 (11)

Do a little more reading guys . . . - LoudandClear 07:44:08 08/23/04 (7)

and yet there is no info about them anywhere, apart from the grapevine, yeah right! - theaudiohobby 09:55:42 08/23/04 (6)

The grapevine cometh (Long) - Bob Wilcox 13:36:09 08/23/04 (0)

Re: and yet there is no info about them anywhere, apart from the grapevine, yeah right! - LoudandClear 11:16:52 08/23/04 (4)

Re: and yet there is no info about them anywhere, apart from the grapevine, yeah right! - theaudiohobby 13:22:09 08/23/04 (3)

Re: and yet there is no info about them anywhere, apart from the grapevine, yeah right! - baranyi 11:07:39 08/25/04 (0)

Re: and yet there is no info about them anywhere, apart from the grapevine, yeah right! - LoudandClear 13:57:03 08/23/04 (0)

Re: and yet there is no info about them anywhere, apart from the grapevine, yeah right! - muralman1 13:35:35 08/23/04 (0)

Re: I'm saying it - Jack G 04:06:40 08/23/04 (1)

Re: I'm saying it - muralman1 12:31:48 08/23/04 (0)

Re: I'm saying it - theaudiohobby 03:59:55 08/23/04 (0)

I am ALL confused now :( - Deglet 01:28:00 08/22/04 (4)

Try the Panny from a local store - serus 15:08:36 08/22/04 (2)

Re: Try the Panny from a local store - Deglet 22:08:03 08/22/04 (1)

Just get an Aleph! - serus 08:57:47 08/24/04 (0)

Re: I am ALL confused now :( - wineau 13:00:48 08/22/04 (0)

Re: So, you are telling me that Panny, Sony, etc. (digital amps) are better than Rowland, Pass, ML, etc.? - Greg T 18:37:35 08/21/04 (3)

The new ICE powered H2O does it all - muralman1 22:26:07 08/21/04 (2)

Re: The new ICE powered H2O does it all - mr_bill 09:37:42 08/22/04 (1)

Re: The new ICE powered H2O does it all - muralman1 13:52:39 08/23/04 (0)

Not stock - audioengr 18:36:02 08/21/04 (3)

Another ad from Steve! - Ric Schultz 23:59:18 08/21/04 (2)

Re: Another ad from Steve! - Gmood1 06:35:07 08/22/04 (1)

Re: Another ad from Steve! - Ric Schultz 13:49:13 08/23/04 (0)

Not to my ears - Tustin Dave 18:31:15 08/21/04 (3)

Re: Not to my ears - Greg T 08:59:38 08/23/04 (0)

Re: Not to my ears - AlphaGeek 13:03:37 08/22/04 (1)

Re: Not to my ears - Tustin Dave 23:45:40 08/22/04 (0)

If it is, what does it matter whether you believe or not? - HD Audio 17:55:47 08/21/04 (0)

No,... - Hepcat 15:54:40 08/21/04 (0)

Re: So, you are telling me that Panny, Sony, etc. (digital amps) are better than Rowland, Pass, ML, etc.? - LoudandClear 15:43:25 08/21/04 (15)

a discovery made with Harmonix RF-57 tuning disks - tonemaniac 16:08:27 08/21/04 (14)

Maybe it helps, but I doubt it can alter DSP algorithms... - serus 18:41:18 08/21/04 (13)

Re: Maybe it helps, but I doubt it can alter DSP algorithms... - Jack G 07:07:33 08/22/04 (11)

I beg to differ... - serus 14:33:31 08/22/04 (10)

an Evo2 is not the same as an Evo4 - tonemaniac 04:19:04 08/23/04 (1)

I accept vibration control, not the DSP "fix" - serus 10:17:52 08/23/04 (0)

Re: I beg to differ... - theaudiohobby 03:43:24 08/23/04 (7)

Different Technologies - serus 10:54:29 08/23/04 (5)

ICE is analog - muralman1 21:49:27 08/23/04 (0)

Re: Different Technologies - Jack G 11:43:39 08/23/04 (2)

Re: Different Technologies - serus 14:07:39 08/23/04 (1)

Re: Different Technologies - theaudiohobby 14:37:03 08/23/04 (0)

thanks for your clarification - theaudiohobby 08/23/0411:06:49 08/23/04 (0)

Indeed - Jack G 04:13:21 08/23/04 (0)

did you listen to the Evo4 in bridged mode ? Much better than Evo2 - tonemaniac 04:47:51 08/22/04 (0)

Follow Ups

thanks for your clarification - theaudiohobby 08/23/0411:06:49 08/23/04 (0)